Search Results for "Representation disposal"

2127 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2127 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2003

The petitioners, K.P. Power Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition in 2003 before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to compel ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order Setting Aside Removal of Railway Employee for Procedural Irregularities. Disciplinary Authority Failed to Consider Inquiry Report and Appellate Authority Denied Hearing, Violating Natural Justice.

The Union of India and the General Manager of Central Railway filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MPCB Closure Order for Violation of Environmental Norms. Petitioner's failure to obtain valid consent to operate under Water and Air Acts justifies closure for operating without environmental clearance.

The petitioner, Green Gene Enviro Protection and Infrastructure Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Dismissal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceedings Due to 12-Year Delay and Denial of Documents. Dismissal Order Set Aside as Non-Supply of Inquiry Report and Documents Violated Principles of Natural Justice Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, employed as a Wireless Operator in Mysore Paper Mills Limited since before 1998, was issued a charge-sheet on 17-12-2010, nearly twelv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against IPAB Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Patent Pre-Grant Opposition. Pre-grant opponent not heard before allowing patent appeal, order set aside and matter remanded.

The petitioner, Dhaval Diyora, filed a pre-grant opposition under Section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 against the patent application of Respondent ...