Search Results for "Compulsory Acquisition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Compulsory Acquisition"

531 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 531 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Second Appeal in RERA Registration Dispute — Development Agreement Not Required to Be Registered Under Registration Act for Project Registration. The Court held that the Goa Real Estate Regulatory Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by insisting on compulsory registration of a development agreement under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, as a precondition for processing a project registration application under Sections 3 and 4 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

18 Jul 2026

The appellant, Edcon Real Estate Developers, a registered partnership firm, filed a Second Appeal under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Developers and MCGM from Recognizing TDR Transfer Agreements in Alleged Fraud by Society Members. Co-operative Housing Society Obtains Interim Relief Against Sale of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) Under DRC Dated 7 August 2023 Amidst Allegations of Forgery and Unauthorized Payments.

3 Oct 2025

The dispute arose from the acquisition of a portion of the plaintiff co-operative housing society's land by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumba...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Reference Case Due to Limitation Issue — Notice Under Section 12(2) Not Served. Limitation for Reference Begins Only Upon Receipt of Notice Under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

10 Feb 2026

The case involves a first appeal filed by the heirs of the original claimant, Pagi Bhemaji Dhiraji (since deceased), challenging the judgment and orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Derequisition of Premises Under Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 — Petitioner Failed to Establish Entitlement as Requisition Was for Public Purpose and No Unauthorized Use Proven.

22 Feb 2019

The Petitioners, All India Cotton Seeds Crushers' Association and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bomb...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Multiple First Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Matter. Dispute Concerns Determination of Compensation for Land Acquired for Nira Deoghar Irrigation Project Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Land Designation for Timber Industry Under Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners, Landowners, Served Purchase Notices and Contended That No Acquisition Steps Were Taken Within Six Months, While Pune Municipal Corporation Asserted Proposal Was Submitted Before Notices.

29 Apr 2005

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases for Airport Expansion — Upholds Single Judge's Refusal to Interfere with KIADB Acquisition. Landowners' challenge to acquisition for Hubli Airport expansion fails as court finds no violation of statutory provisions under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

28 Mar 2013

The case involves four writ appeals filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their land by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

18 Dec 2018

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Writ Petition and Quashes Impugned Letter Declaring Reservation Lapsed Under Section 49(7) of MRTP Act. Court Holds That Failure to Initiate Acquisition Under Section 126 Within One Year of Confirmed Purchase Notice Leads to Automatic Lapse, and Deems Development Permission Granted Under Section 45(5) Due to Non-communication of Decision.

4 Dec 2017

The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Beed town, challenged the continuing reservation of their land as a garden in the development plan of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking TDR for Land Acquired Under MRTP Act — Transferable Development Rights Claim Barred by Limitation as Application Filed Beyond Reasonable Period After Possession. The court held that a claim for TDR under Section 126(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 must be made within a reasonable period, and a delay of seven years from the date of possession disentitles the claimant.

10 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Karan Developers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Pune Municipal Corporati...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)