Search Results for "Clear vacancy"

1122 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1122 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order Invalidating No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Rules Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act Held Directory, Not Mandatory, and Substantial Compliance Sufficient.

The petitioner, Prajakta Prabhakar Kadu, the Up-Sarpanch of Gram-Panchayat Shedsai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Splendor Complex. Unauthorized structures built in violation of sanctioned plans and DCR are liable for demolition under Section 53 of MRTP Act, 1966.

The case involves six writ petitions filed by residents of Splendor Complex, JVLR, Andheri (East), Mumbai, challenging the demolition of certain struc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Home University Reservation in Technical Courses. Rules 9(3)(c), 9(3)(d) and 13 of Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions Rules, 2017 held intra vires the Act and not violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 15(4) and 29(2).

The petitioners, eight students from various districts in Maharashtra, filed a writ petition challenging Rules 9(3)(c), 9(3)(d) and 13 of the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Bar Association Election Dispute. Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the applicant (original defendant No.2) challenging an order dated 18/11/2019 passed by the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Promotion Rule of Forest Development Corporation Requiring Departmental Exam, Dismisses RFO's Petition. Rule 3(1) Providing Different Deadlines for Existing and Future Officers Held Non-Discriminatory as Multiple Opportunities Given and Seniority Not Sole Basis.

The dispute arose when a Range Forest Officer employed with the Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (F.D.C.M.) challenged his supersess...