Income Tax Appeals by Wipro Limited and Revenue Against Orders of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore for Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005
25 Mar 2015...
Search Results for "Central Government Authority"
7135 result(s) found
Found 7135 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.
25 Mar 2015The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...
- 52
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector. Notification under Section 26A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 held invalid for being arbitrary and disproportionate to the objective of curbing misuse.
22 Aug 2019The case involves a challenge to a notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, ...
- 279
High Court
- 32
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Passes Interim Orders to Curb Illegal Mining in Odisha and Directs Central Empowered Committee to Identify Violating Lessees. Mining Operations Require Mandatory Clearances Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Non-Compliance Renders Operations Illegal and Subject to Immediate Intervention Under Article 32.
1 Aug 2026Two writ petitions were filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by Common Cause and by Prafulla Samantra and Anr. against the Union of India and ot...
- 52
High Court
- 45
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Against BDA’s Land Acquisition Notifications for Layout Formation. The petitions challenged the preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and the final notification under the BDA Act.
11 Jul 2014A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners, who a...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Notices Against Directors in Central Excise Case — No Personal Liability Without Specific Statutory Provision. Directors of a company cannot be treated as assessees or deemed to be in default for excise duty demands under the Central Excise Act, 1944, in the absence of a provision akin to Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
17 Aug 2005The petitioners, Sunil Parmeshwar Mittal and Kirti Trambaklal Shah, were directors of a company that was assessed for excise duty. The Deputy Commissi...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs University to Grant Affiliation for PG Unani Course Despite Delay in Application. University's Refusal Based on Cut-off Date Held Unreasonable When Delay Caused by Statutory Permission Process Under Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970.
10 Aug 2016The petitioners, Maharashtra Medical Education & Research Centre and its Z.V.M. Unani Medical College, sought a writ of mandamus directing the Maharas...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Issues Directions to Enforce Fitness Certificate Tests Under Motor Vehicles Act. Failure to Implement Rule 62 of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 Found to Contribute to Road Accidents and Loss of Life.
18 Feb 2016The petitioner, appearing in person and assisted by amicus curiae, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking enforcement of provisions of the Motor V...
- 23
