Search Results for "Central Board"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Central Board"

4776 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4776 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BBMP Recovery Demand Against Swimming Centre for Lack of Authority. Demand for Rs. 1,93,73,184 for alleged excess water consumption set aside as BBMP lacked jurisdiction to levy such charges under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

10 Nov 2021

The petitioner, M/S. PM Swimming Centre, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowner's Compensation Claim Under Indian Telegraph Act for Tree Removal by Electricity Board - Maintainability of Application Under Section 16(3) Upheld. The court held that Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 applies to electricity boards for compensation for tree removal, and the District Judge has jurisdiction to decide such application.

8 Dec 2005

The case involves two writ petitions. The first writ petition was filed by Sau. Kalpana Rukhabdas Jain, a landowner, challenging the order dated 25.1....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rejection of Nomination for Waqf Board Election Due to Non-Application of Mind. Petitioner's Candidature as Muslim Advocate Member Under Section 14(1)(b)(iii) of Waqf Act, 1995 Upheld.

12 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Mr. Asif Ali Shaikh Hussain, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the order ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Condonation of Delay in Investment Under Section 54EC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CBDT's Rejection Set Aside. The CBDT's power under Section 119(2)(b) is not circumscribed by any time limit and must be exercised liberally to avoid hardship.

24 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Dr. Sujatha Ramesh, sold an immovable property during the Assessment Year 2013-14 and realized long-term capital gains. To claim exemp...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Criminal Revision Application Against Conviction Under Sections 44, 25, 26 of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. Conviction Challenged by Accused Nos.3 and 4 was Upheld by Sessions Court, and Revision Filed in High Court.

2 Apr 2025

The revision application was filed by the applicants, who were original accused nos.3 and 4, challenging the judgment dated 23.08.2002 passed by the C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

21 Jun 2016

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Selection of Reader in Ayurvedic College — Selection Process Not Vitiated by Alleged Bias or Procedural Irregularities. Petitioner Failed to Prove Bias or Mala Fides in Selection Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

6 Jun 2017

The petitioner, Dr. Rajeshkumar Prakashchandra Gupta, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ju...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)