Search Results for "1984 Amendment"

1487 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1487 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.

The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rules on Unlawful Subletting: Transfer of Tenancy Disguised as Business Sale Invalid. Court highlights the misuse of tenancy rights and emphasizes protection of landlords under Bombay Rent Act.

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, legal heirs, in a long-standing eviction dispute regarding unlawful subletting of commercial p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Restoration of Majority Award on Escalation Clause Interpretation. Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 Not Attracted as Arbitral Interpretation of Contract Clause Was Plausible.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside a majority arbitral award under Section 30 of the Arbi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Family Court Jurisdiction Case — Plaint Return Order Set Aside. Suit for Declaration of Rights and Injunction Between Family Members Is Maintainable Before Family Court Under Section 7 of Family Courts Act, 1984.

The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Smt. Narasamma, filed O.S.No.28/2022 before the Principal Judge, Family Court at Raich...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Claim of Automatic Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 49(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Argued That Failure to Acquire Land Within Prescribed Period After Purchase Notice Entitled Them to Release From Reservation.

The petitions arose from the reservation of land in Andheri, Mumbai, for a public garden under successive development plans. The petitioner, Mehtab La...