Search Results for "missing suit"

490 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 490 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Subsidy Reimbursement in Solar Mission Case Due to Disputed Questions of Fact. Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Held Inappropriate for Adjudicating Contractual Subsidy Claims Requiring Evidence.

The petitioner, Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Food Corporation of India Against Railway Claims Tribunal Order Dismissing Claim for Non-Compliance of Section 80 CPC. Notice Under Section 80 CPC Not Required for Claims Before Railway Claims Tribunal as It Is Not a Civil Court.

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) filed a suit in the Civil Court at Jalgaon on 15.10.1981 for recovery of Rs.30,125/- due to short delivery of 241 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rudresh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Chitradurga in S.C.No.23/2011 for offences under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Drug-Laced Biscuit Theft Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 328 and 379 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Administration of Poisonous Substance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramu s/o Vijay Mandal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, in Sessions Case No. 13 of 2008 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Double Murder and Criminal Conspiracy. Convictions Under Sections 302, 120B, 364 IPC and Arms Act Based on Circumstantial Evidence Challenged on Merits.

The case pertains to the murder of Advocate Pradeep Nalamwar and Vijay Bisne, allegedly carried out at the behest of accused no. 4 Swami, the landlord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Maintainability Challenge and Upholds RERA Recovery Certificate in Allottee Refund Case. Real Estate Regulatory Authority Has Power to Issue Recovery Certificate Under Section 40(1) of RERA Act, 2016 for Refund Orders.

The judgment pertains to two connected matters: an Interim Application filed by the developer, Marvel Sigma Homes Pvt. Ltd., challenging the maintaina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...