Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"

621 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 621 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Second Appeal Against Concurrent Decrees Declaring Lapse of Land Reservation. Issues of Lapsing Under Section 127 of MRTP Act and Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 149 Argued.

30 Apr 2025

This second appeal arose from concurrent judgments and decrees of lower courts declaring that the reservation on the suit property, owned by the respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Mechanical Rejection of Rehabilitation Claims Under National Highways Act. The Court held that the provisions of the First, Second, and Third Schedules of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 apply to land acquisition under the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Competent Authority must individually assess each claimant's entitlement to rehabilitation and resettlement benefits.

25 Oct 2024

This batch of writ petitions involved a common question of law: whether and how the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in L...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court Order Declaring Proceedings Lapsed. Acquisition Upheld as Physical Possession Taken and Land Utilized for Public Purpose, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

24 Feb 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition, declaring that acquisition proceedings under the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Declaration of Lapse in Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Upheld as Possession Was Taken and Compensation Deposited, Preventing Deemed Lapse Under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

9 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation against a judgment of the High Court of Delhi, which had declared ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. The Court held that acquisition proceedings did not lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as physical possession was taken, and the writ petitioner failed to establish ownership and title required for challenging the acquisition.

20 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA and Govt. of NCT of Delhi Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Not Deemed Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Act, 2013 When Possession Taken but Compensation Not Paid. Possession Taken on 26.05.1998 Vests Land in State; No Divesting Under Section 24(2) as per Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal.

15 Dec 2022

The case involves appeals by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Government of NCT of Delhi against a judgment of the Delhi High Court. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Reservation Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. Petitioner's Land Reservation Lapses Automatically Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 as Respondents Did Not Issue Declaration Under Section 126.

9 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Purshotam Vishandas Raheja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Designation Under Section 69(2) of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 — Petitioner Failed to Show That Designation Was Made Under Master Plan-2031 or That Land Was Not Acquired Within Five Years.

30 Sep 2021

The petitioner, Sri Narayanaswamy, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengalur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Notice Issued to Deceased Person Invalid. The court held that a notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 issued to a person who had died before the notice is invalid, and since possession was not taken and compensation not paid, the acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Vithoba Ravaji Jadhav (since deceased through legal heir Subhash Vithoba Jadhav), owned land Gat No.422/2 at Vadgaon Bhande, Tal. Daun...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under KIAD Act — Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable. Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Under KIAD Act, 1966 Held Not Governed by the 2013 Act, and Notifications Do Not Lapse.

17 Aug 2017

The petitioners, landowners in Belagola village, Srirangapattana taluk, Mandya district, challenged the preliminary notification dated 15.09.2000 issu...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)