High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "illegal import"
1018 result(s) found
Found 1018 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Against TDS Notices Issued to Turf Clubs Under Section 194B of Income Tax Act — Argued That Stake Money Is Not Winnings. Petitioners Contend That CBDT Circular No.467 Exempts Stake Money From TDS and That Such Payments Are Business Income Taxable Under Section 74A, Not Winnings Under Section 194B.
26 Sep 2014The batch of writ petitions before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore arose from notices issued by the Income Tax Department to turf clubs in Ba...
- 34
High Court
High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Rejecting Secondary Evidence Application in Specific Performance Suit. Trial Court Directed to Permit Plaintiffs to Lead Evidence of Lost Agreement to Sell Upon Establishing Foundational Facts Under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
1 Oct 2019This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the original plaintiffs against an order of the trial court rejecting t...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal Against Discharge Under MCOC Act — Prima Facie Material Found Sufficient for Trial. The Court held that the Special Judge erred in allowing transfer under Section 11 MCOC Act without considering the prima facie material indicating organized crime.
29 Sep 2006The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 2nd September 2002 passed by the learned Special Judge, MCOC Act, Nashik in MCO...
- 92
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — JSW Steel Ltd. v. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. — Challenge to Rejection of Claims Under Fire, Marine, and Business Interruption Policies Dismissed as No Patent Illegality Found.
19 Dec 2018The Petitioner, JSW Steel Ltd., engaged in steel manufacturing, had insured its plant at Toranagallu, Karnataka, under five insurance policies issued ...
- 75
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 43
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Writ Petition by Concessionaire Challenging NOC for Access to Retail Outlet on BOT Highway. Key Legal Question is Whether Concessionaire’s Statutory and Contractual Rights to Control Access Override Highway Administration’s Power to Grant Access Permissions Under Section 8A of National Highways Act, 1956.
24 Oct 2017The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Nandi Highway Developers Ltd (the concessionaire) challenging a no-objection certificate (NOC) dated 2...
- 36
High Court
High Court of Bombay Passes Interim Orders Directing Restoration of Lake and Prevention of Mangrove Destruction in Navi Mumbai. Modification of Development Plan to Permit Golf Course Raised Public Interest Concerns.
1 Nov 2018The public interest litigations were filed to address the systematic destruction of mangroves and wetlands in Navi Mumbai. The petitioners in PIL 218/...
- 62
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
3 Dec 2015The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...
- 53
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Magistrate's Summoning Order in Hawala Case — High Court's Revision Order Set Aside. Court holds that at the stage of taking cognizance under Section 190(1)(b) CrPC, the Magistrate need not record detailed reasons; sufficiency of grounds is to be assessed from the charge sheet and accompanying documents.
8 Feb 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Gujarat against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had set aside the order of the...
- 170
