Search Results for "contractor supply"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "contractor supply"

684 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 684 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute Between L&T and HPCL — Court Sets Aside Award on Claims for Extra Work and Interest, Upholds Claims for Refund of Liquidated Damages and Escalation. The court restored the arbitrator's award on refund of liquidated damages and escalation, holding that the Single Judge exceeded the limited scope of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Sep 2016

The case involves two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Port Trust's Challenge to Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Ruling in Concession Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Not Binding on Consortium Members as They Were Not Signatories to the Concession Agreement.

1 Mar 2018

The petitioner, the Board of Trustees of the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, a major port constituted under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, issued a glo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Reference on Whether Mathadi Act Applies Only to Casually Engaged Workers; Considers Statutory Definition of Unprotected Worker Under Section 2(11)

30 Aug 2006

Background: A group of writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various employers including Kay Kay Embroideries P. Ltd., Bhulwalka S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to MSME Facilitation Council Awards Against National Textile Corporation. Awards Upheld as Facilitation Council Had Jurisdiction Under MSMED Act and Awards Not Patently Illegal.

21 Mar 2023

The petitioner, National Textile Corporation Ltd., filed two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging awa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows ONGC's Appeal and Dismisses Soconord's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Oil Well Casing Pipes — Umpire's Award Upheld as Not Liable to Be Set Aside Under Section 30 of Arbitration Act, 1940. Court Held That the Learned Single Judge Erred in Setting Aside the Award on Grounds of Non-Consideration of Certain Aspects, as the Umpire Had Considered All Relevant Material and the Award Was Not Vitiated by Any Error of Law Apparent on the Face of the Record.

24 Jul 2014

The case involves cross-appeals arising from an arbitration dispute between Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) and M/s. Soconord OCTG, SA (S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitrator's Findings on Contract Rescission and Quantification of Damages Are Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Feb 2016

The case involves an arbitration appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from a construction contract dispute. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Injunction in Electricity Act Dispute — LILO Scheme Not a 'Works' Under Section 164. Court holds that LILO scheme does not constitute 'laying of electric lines' under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and that the District Judge correctly upheld the injunction against the petitioner.

9 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Century Rayon Limited, challenged an order dated 28 June 2018 passed by the learned District Judge-4, Kalyan, dismissing its Miscellan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Injunction Bank Guarantee Encashment in Commercial Contract Dispute. Court holds that invocation of unconditional bank guarantees must be honoured unless there is clear fraud or irretrievable injustice, and disputes over contract termination do not constitute fraud.

22 Mar 2022

The Appellant, Reliance Infrastructure Limited, entered into a contract with Respondent No.1, NLC India Limited, for the supply of coal under a Letter...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Revenue's Challenge Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Service Tax Demand on Oil Companies for CNG Sale. Dispute Concerns Classification of CNG Sale by BPCL and HPCL as Business Auxiliary Service under Section 65(19) of Finance Act, 1994.

1 Jan 1970

The present civil appeals before the Supreme Court, filed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai, under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, ...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)