Search Results for "Income Tax Refund"

465 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 465 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Income Tax Dispute — Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 Applicability. Court holds that a Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed against an appeal dismissed in limine is covered under the DTVSV Act, 2020.

The petitioner, Oerlikon Balzers Coating India Private Limited, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the rejection ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Condonation of Delay in Investment Under Section 54EC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CBDT's Rejection Set Aside. The CBDT's power under Section 119(2)(b) is not circumscribed by any time limit and must be exercised liberally to avoid hardship.

The petitioner, Dr. Sujatha Ramesh, sold an immovable property during the Assessment Year 2013-14 and realized long-term capital gains. To claim exemp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of One-Day Delay in Filing Income Tax Return Due to Technical Glitch. Delay of One Day in E-Filing Held to Be Beyond Assessee's Control, Entitling Condonation Under Section 119(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Cosme Matias Menezes Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. CMM Logistics Pvt. Ltd. against the Commissioner of Inc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute with Western Geco International Ltd. — Delay in Payment of Mobilization Advance Constituted Breach by ONGC, Entitling Contractor to Damages of US$ 2,936,607.82.

The case involves a challenge by Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC), a public sector undertaking, against an arbitral award dated 4-2-2005 made...