Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Income Tax Dispute — Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 Applicability. Court holds that a Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed against an appeal dismissed in limine is covered under the DTVSV Act, 2020.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Oerlikon Balzers Coating India Private Limited, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the rejection order dated 3rd August 2021 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune. The rejection order stated that the petitioner's Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was not covered under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 (DTVSV Act) as it was not filed in pursuance of an appeal 'dismissed in limine'. The petitioner sought a mandamus directing the respondent to issue an acknowledgment in Form 3 against the application made in Form 1 and Form 2 under Section 4 of the DTVSV Act read with Rule 3 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Rules, 2020. The facts reveal that the petitioner filed its original e-return for Assessment Year 2009-10 on 31st October 2009, declaring a total income of ₹16,27,70,190. On 11th August 2010, it revised its ITR to declare an income of ₹16,15,96,380. The revised ITR was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act on 29th March 2011, resulting in a refund of ₹1,50,46,150. The assessment was selected for scrutiny, leading to additions and subsequent appeals. The petitioner's appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was dismissed in limine on 31st January 2020. The petitioner then filed a Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) of the Act on 28th February 2020, which was pending. The petitioner applied under the DTVSV Act, but the respondent rejected the application on the ground that the appeal was dismissed in limine and not pending. The legal issue was whether a Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) against an order dismissing an appeal in limine is covered under the DTVSV Act. The petitioner argued that the appeal is pending until the miscellaneous application is decided, while the respondent contended that the appeal was finally disposed of. The Court analyzed the provisions of the DTVSV Act, particularly Section 2(1)(a) which defines 'appeal pending', and held that the expression includes a Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) as the appeal is not finally disposed of until the miscellaneous application is decided. The Court emphasized that the DTVSV Act is a beneficial legislation aimed at reducing litigation and should be interpreted liberally. The Court allowed the petition, quashed the rejection order, and directed the respondent to issue the acknowledgment in Form 3.

Headnote

A) Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 - Appeal Pending - Section 2(1)(a) - Interpretation - The issue was whether a Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed against an order dismissing an appeal in limine is covered under the DTVSV Act, 2020. The Court held that the expression 'appeal pending' under Section 2(1)(a) of the DTVSV Act includes a Miscellaneous Application filed under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, as the appeal is not finally disposed of until the miscellaneous application is decided. The Court directed the respondent to issue acknowledgment in Form 3 under the DTVSV Act. (Paras 1-12)

B) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 254(2) - Miscellaneous Application - Dismissal in Limine - The Court interpreted that an appeal dismissed in limine does not result in a final disposal if a Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) is filed, as the Tribunal retains jurisdiction to rectify mistakes. The Court relied on the principle that the DTVSV Act is a beneficial legislation aimed at reducing litigation. (Paras 5-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a Miscellaneous Application filed under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order dismissing an appeal in limine is covered under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned rejection order dated 3rd August 2021, and directed Respondent No. 2 to issue acknowledgment in Form 3 under the DTVSV Act within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of 'appeal pending' under DTVSV Act
  • 2020
  • Scope of Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Meaning of 'dismissed in limine'
  • Applicability of DTVSV Act to miscellaneous applications
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (06) 123

WRIT PETITION NO. 6228 OF 2021

2023-06-27

DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, KAMAL KHATA

2023:BHC-AS:17511-DB

Sanket Bora, Ms. Vidhi Punmiya, Suresh Kumar

Oerlikon Balzers Coating India Private Limited

Union of India, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune – 3

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging rejection of application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of rejection order dated 3rd August 2021 and mandamus to issue acknowledgment in Form 3 under DTVSV Act.

Filing Reason

Respondent rejected petitioner's application under DTVSV Act on the ground that the Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) was not filed in pursuance of an appeal 'dismissed in limine'.

Previous Decisions

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed petitioner's appeal in limine on 31st January 2020. Petitioner filed Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) on 28th February 2020, which was pending.

Issues

Whether a Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order dismissing an appeal in limine is covered under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the appeal is pending until the Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) is decided, and thus covered under DTVSV Act. Respondent argued that the appeal was dismissed in limine and finally disposed of, so not covered under DTVSV Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The expression 'appeal pending' under Section 2(1)(a) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 includes a Miscellaneous Application filed under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order dismissing an appeal in limine, as the appeal is not finally disposed of until the miscellaneous application is decided. The DTVSV Act being a beneficial legislation should be interpreted liberally to reduce litigation.

Judgment Excerpts

By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned rejection order dated 3rd August 2021 passed by Respondent no. 2 whereby the Miscellaneous Application (‘MA’) filed by the Petitioner under section (‘u/s’) 254 (2) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (‘Act’) was stated as not covered under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 (‘DTVSV-A’) as it was not filed in pursuance of an appeal ‘dismissed in limine’. The expression 'appeal pending' under Section 2(1)(a) of the DTVSV Act includes a Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, as the appeal is not finally disposed of until the miscellaneous application is decided.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed original e-return for AY 2009-10 on 31st October 2009, revised on 11th August 2010, processed on 29th March 2011. Assessment selected for scrutiny leading to additions. Appeal before CIT(A) dismissed. Further appeal before ITAT dismissed in limine on 31st January 2020. Petitioner filed Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) on 28th February 2020. Petitioner applied under DTVSV Act, but respondent rejected on 3rd August 2021. Petitioner filed Writ Petition on 2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 143(1), 254(2)
  • Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020: 2(1)(a), 4
  • Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Rules, 2020: 3
  • Constitution of India: 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Income Tax Dispute — Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 Applicability. Court holds that a Miscellaneous Application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed against an appeal dismissed in li...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Bogus Purchase Case, Upholds ITAT's 25% Disallowance. Court holds that when purchases are not bogus but from non-genuine parties, estimation of profit element at 25% is reasonable.