Search Results for "Gram Panchayat election"

393 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 393 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Challenge to Collector's Disqualification Order under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. The Sarpanch of a Scheduled Area Gram Panchayat was disqualified for failing to convene any meeting for 90 days during the financial year 2024-2025.

The petition was filed by the elected Sarpanch of Bilawali Gram Panchayat, Taluka Wada, District Palghar, challenging the order dated 27 March 2025 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Gram Panchayat Election Results Due to Late Filing of Affidavit — Affidavit Filed One Day After Statement of Election Expenses Held Not Fatal Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Election Expenses) Order, 2015.

The petitioners, who were unsuccessful candidates in the Gram Panchayat election of Manjarsumba, challenged the election of respondent nos.1 to 6 on t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Against Disqualification Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act for Encroachment by Family Member. Personal Encroachment Required for Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Nikhil Uttam Undre, was elected as a member and Sarpanch of Manjri (Khurd) village panchayat in 2021. Respondent No. 6 filed a dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Gram Panchayat Election Tie-Breaker Case — Returning Officer's Decision to Draw Lots Upheld. Rule 73 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Election) Rules, 1993 Provides for Determination of Result by Lot When Candidates Secure Equal Votes.

The appellant, Chandrakala, contested the Gram Panchayat election for Ward No.6 of Degalmadi Gram Panchayat. On 30.12.2020, the Returning Officer (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...