Search Results for "Execution petition maintainability"

995 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 995 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Execution Order in Favor of Judgment Debtor Due to Bar of Limitation Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963. Arbitral Award Dated 18.01.2010 Filed for Execution in 2023 Held Time-Barred; Filing of Section 34 Application Does Not Extend Limitation.

The writ petition was filed by the Amravati District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., the judgment debtor, challenging two orders passed by the 8th Joi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GCZMA Demolition Order for Lack of Quorum and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's 18 rooms saved as sub-committee meeting with only 4 members violated requirement of 5 members for cases directed by High Court.

The petitioner, Shri Sylvestre D'Souza, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 15/02...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Non-Payment of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Acquisition Lapses as Compensation Not Paid Within Five Years Despite Possession Taken.

The petitioners, original owners of land at Roadpali, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, challenged the acquisition of their land by CIDCO under the Land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Charity Commissioner's Permission for Lease of Trust Land for 30 Years Without Public Notice. Question Involved Whether Mandatory Advertisement Under Bombay Public Trust Act Was Dispensable for Long-Term Agricultural Lease.

The writ petition was filed by three residents of village Hinglajwadi, claiming to be devotees and interested persons under Section 2(10)(a) of the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Reconsiders Validity of Appellate Side Rule on Marathi Translations After Earlier Division Bench Held It Unconstitutional. Larger Bench Examines Whether Litigants Were Heard Before Rule Declared Null and Void Under Article 348.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a practicing advocate who was prevented by the High Court Registry from filing a petition without first...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010479002008_1

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...