Search Results for "Customs tariff"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Customs tariff"

312 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal in Customs Jurisdiction Dispute — Mere Registered Office Location Insufficient for Territorial Jurisdiction. Cause of Action for Import Consignment Arises at Place of Import and Delivery, Not at Registered Office Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

10 Jul 2015

The appellant, M/s Rajesh Exports Limited, a company with its registered office in Bangalore, filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court ch...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in VAT Dispute — Purchase Price Under GVAT Act Does Not Include VAT Component. Value Added Tax and unclaimed tax credit purchases excluded from taxable turnover of purchases for reduction of tax credit under Section 11(3)(b) of Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

2 Aug 2024

The State of Gujarat appealed against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which affirmed the order of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal. The dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Policy Circulars in SEIS Benefits Case — Circulars Imposing Additional Conditions for Service Providers Held Ultra Vires. Shipping Agent Entitled to SEIS Benefits as Service Provider Under Foreign Trade Policy.

9 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Atlantic Shipping Private Limited, a shipping agent providing port services and logistical support to foreign clients, challenged the ...

High Court

Validation of DRI Officers' Jurisdiction. Establishing the authority of DRI officers as proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

26 Nov 2024

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Idea Cellular Ltd., challenging the jurisdiction of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Designated Authority's Termination of Anti-Dumping Investigation Due to Insufficient Data Period. Causal Link Between Dumped Imports and Injury Not Established, High Court's Substitution of Findings on 'Like Article' Exceeded Judicial Review.

1 Sep 2020

The appeals arose from a challenge by the Designated Authority (DA) and the Central Government against three orders of the Telangana High Court concer...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on CENVAT Credit Restriction for Inputs from 100% EOU. Rule 3(6)(a)(i) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 restricts credit on inputs manufactured by a 100% EOU, and reversal under Rule 3(4) does not remove the restriction.

12 Apr 2019

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the Customs, Excise ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Heinz India and GSK, Classifies Nycil Prickly Heat Powder as Medicated Talcum Powder Under Sales Tax Acts. Product Held Not to Be Medicine Despite Medicinal Properties Due to Specific Statutory Entries Including Medicated Talcum Powder Under Entry 127 of KGST Act and Toilet Powder Under Entry 1(iii) of TNGST Act.

4 May 2023

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals concerning the classification of Nycil Prickly Heat Powder under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (KGST Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Advance Authorization Benefits for Export of Pharmaceutical Products. Court holds that the condition of 'direct physical handling' of goods by the applicant is not a mandatory requirement under the Foreign Trade Policy and that the Policy does not prohibit third-party procurement or supply.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Sandoz Private Limited and Lupin Limited, are pharmaceutical companies engaged in the manufacture and export of pharmaceutical produc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition Against Rebate Claims for Export of Yarn — Revisional Authority's Order Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Section 35-EE of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that the revisional authority has the power to condone delay in filing revision application, and the High Court will not interfere with such discretionary order under Article 226.

3 May 2006

The petitioners, the Commissioner of Central Excise and the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)