Search Results for "CESTAT order"

330 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 330 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeals of Travel Agencies in Service Tax Export Case — Services Rendered to Foreign Clients Abroad Constitute Export of Service Under Finance Act, 1994. Extended Period of Limitation Under Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994 Cannot Be Invoked Without Suppression or Fraud.

The Madras High Court allowed two appeals filed by M/s. Translanka Air Travels Pvt Ltd and M/s. ETA Travel Agency Pvt Ltd against orders of the Custom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Dismisses Customs Appeals Against Importers as Withdrawn. Commissioner of Customs Sought Permission to Withdraw Appeals Filed Under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 Against CESTAT Order, Which Was Granted.

The Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin, filed two Civil Miscellaneous Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, before the Madurai Bench of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Excise Department’s Appeals Against CESTAT Order Remanding Cases for Denial of Natural Justice. Court Holds That Non-Furnishing of Vital Documents to Assessee Violates Principles of Natural Justice, Despite Department’s Claim of Assessee’s Delaying Tactics.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa dismissed a batch of seven Excise Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Goa, against a common...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Valuation Case — Sequential Application of Valuation Rules Mandatory. Rule 7 and Rule 9 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 Cannot Be Applied Without First Considering Rules 4 and 5 for Identical or Similar Goods.

The case involves appeals by M/s. Diyas Mantra Lighting Private Limited and its directors against orders of the Principal Commissioner of Customs (Pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of CVD Paid on Imported Mobile Phones Under Exemption Notification. The court held that the exemption notification No.12/2012-Customs applies to imports and directed reconsideration of refund claims subject to verification of unjust enrichment.

The petitioner, Micromax Informatics Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, imported mobile handsets during July 2014 to June 2015 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue to Withdraw Customs Appeals Based on CBEC Monetary Threshold Instructions. Court permits withdrawal of appeals and review of Tribunal orders under Section 35R of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 131BA of Customs Act, 1962.

The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Goa, filed nine Customs Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against orders of the Cust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against CESTAT Remand Order in Central Excise Refund Claim — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Tribunal's Remand for Fresh Adjudication with All Issues Kept Open Does Not Give Rise to Appealable Question Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., filed a refund claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Assistant Commissioner ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Recovery Case — Customs Authorities Cannot Recover Duty Dehors Sections 28 and 125 of Customs Act, 1962. Duty on Confiscated Goods Not Recoverable When Redemption Option Not Exercised.

The Bombay High Court, in an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, considered two substantial questions of law: whether customs authoriti...