Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Dismisses Customs Appeals Against Importers as Withdrawn. Commissioner of Customs Sought Permission to Withdraw Appeals Filed Under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 Against CESTAT Order, Which Was Granted.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin, filed two Civil Miscellaneous Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, challenging a common final order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 28.03.2019. The respondents were importers/exporters, namely M/s.RC.Impex and M/s.Rehoboth Exports and Imports. At the hearing on 14.03.2025, the Senior Standing Counsel for Customs and CGST sought permission to withdraw both appeals and made the necessary endorsements. The Division Bench of Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran and Ms. Justice R. Poornima allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. The judgment did not involve any adjudication on the merits of the CESTAT order.

Headnote

A) Customs Law - Appeal to High Court - Withdrawal of Appeal - Customs Act, 1962, Section 130 - The Commissioner of Customs filed appeals against CESTAT orders but sought permission to withdraw them at the hearing - Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, closing connected miscellaneous petitions - Held that withdrawal is allowed without any order as to costs (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

C.M.A(MD)Nos.919 and 920 of 2019

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both Civil Miscellaneous Appeals dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed.

Law Points

  • Appeals filed under Section 130 of Customs Act
  • 1962 withdrawn
  • dismissal as withdrawn
  • no costs
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 191

C.M.A(MD)Nos.919 and 920 of 2019 and C.M.P(MD)No.12380 and 12384 of 2019

2025-03-14

Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran, Ms. Justice R. Poornima

2025:MHC:717

Mr. R. Nandakumar (Appellant), Mr. A.K. Jayaraj (Respondents)

The Commissioner of Customs, Custom House, New Harbour Estate, Tuticorin – 628 004

1. M/s.RC.Impex, Tirunelveli; 2. M/s.Rehoboth Exports and Imports, Tuticorin

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil Miscellaneous Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against CESTAT order

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought withdrawal of the appeals after initially seeking to set aside the CESTAT order

Previous Decisions

CESTAT Common Final Order Nos.40637-40638/2019 dated 28.03.2019

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeals

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Senior Standing Counsel for Customs and CGST seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals and has also made endorsements to that effect. In view of the same, these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Procedural History

Appeals filed under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court challenging the CESTAT Common Final Order Nos.40637-40638/2019 dated 28.03.2019. At the hearing on 14.03.2025, the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Customs Act, 1962: 130
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Assault Case Due to Unreliable Interested Testimony and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 323, 325, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable dou...
Related Judgement
High Court Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Dismisses Customs Appeals Against Importers as Withdrawn. Commissioner of Customs Sought Permission to Withdraw Appeals Filed Under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 Against CESTAT Order, Which Was Granted.