Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petitions Filed by Employees of Survey Sections in Various Tahsildar Offices. Relief Sought and Final Decision Not Specified in Available Text.
26 Feb 2014...
Search Results for "rule 10(2)"
2138 result(s) found
Found 2138 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Receptionist in Immigration Fraud Case — No Prima Facie Case of Cheating or Immigration Offences. Mere employment as receptionist without active participation in alleged conspiracy does not attract Section 420 IPC or Sections 10, 24, 25 of Immigration Act, 1983.
14 Sep 2016The petitioner, Mrs. Nadia Maggie de Costa, was a receptionist employed by one Vijay Ghanashamdas Tulshiyani, who was involved in recruiting candidate...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Notice of Motion in MOFA-MMRDA Dispute. Flat Purchasers Claimed MOFA Rights on Land Owned by MMRDA and Leased to Developer, Which Respondents Disputed as Excluded Under MMRDA Act.
17 Mar 2022This appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from the dismissal of a Notice of Motion by a learned Single Judge in a suit concerning a plot of land ...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court examines legality of appointing persons with criminal background as Ministers. Interpretation of Articles 75 and 164 of the Constitution to uphold democratic integrity and combat criminalisation of politics.
1 Aug 2026The present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed as a public interest litigation by the petitioner, Manoj Narula, challenging ...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Rejects Maintainability Objection in Appointment Dispute Under Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act. Writ Petition Challenging Selection as Assistant Manager MIS Held Maintainable as Petitioner Not an Employee and Alternate Remedy Does Not Bar Jurisdiction Under Section 70.
19 Aug 2021The petitioner, T.B. Venugopal, applied for the post of Assistant Manager MIS in the Tumkur Milk Producers Co-operative Societies Union Limited pursua...
- 46
High Court
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Surcharge Orders Under Section 79(3) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 — Concurrent Findings of Fact by Three Authorities Not Interfered With. Statutory officers of a co-operative housing society held liable for misappropriation of funds based on evidence, with no perversity found in the impugned orders.
24 Feb 2020The petitioners, Usha Jadhav and another, were erstwhile chairman and secretary of Shripati Arcade Annexe-II Co-operative Housing Society, Mumbai, fro...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Performance Licenses for Tamasha Troupes — Violation of Natural Justice. Licenses Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing Under Tamasha Rules, 1960.
9 Feb 2021The petitioners, Renuka Sanskritik Kala Kendra and Natraj Sanskrutik Kala Kendra, are proprietors of tamasha troupes operating in Moha, Taluka Jamkhed...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RBI Moratorium on Urban Co-operative Bank. RBI Directions Under Section 35A of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 Are Binding and Not Subject to Challenge Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.
30 Nov -0001The case involves three writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the directions issued by the Reserve Bank of Indi...
- 208
High Court
Special Court Convicts Broker and Beneficiaries in BMC Bank Securities Fraud; Acquits Employees and Other Brokers. Broker Held Liable for Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Property Under Section 411 IPC, While Beneficiaries Convicted of Cheating Under Section 420 IPC.
18 Jan 2014The case involved a criminal trial before the Special Court under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 19...
- 64
