Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Performance Licenses for Tamasha Troupes — Violation of Natural Justice. Licenses Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing Under Tamasha Rules, 1960.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Renuka Sanskritik Kala Kendra and Natraj Sanskrutik Kala Kendra, are proprietors of tamasha troupes operating in Moha, Taluka Jamkhed, District Ahmednagar. They were granted performance licenses under the Rules For Licensing And Controlling Places Of Public Amusements (Other Than Cinemas) And Performances For Public Amusement, Including Cabaret Performances, Discotheque, Games, Pol Game Parlours, Amusement Parlours Providing Computer Games, Virtual Reality Games, Cyber Cafes, Games With net Connectivity, Bowling Alleys, Card Rooms, Social Clubs, Sports Clubs, Melas And Tamashas Rules, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Tamasha Rules). On 29-11-2019, the District Magistrate/Collector, Ahmednagar, passed orders cancelling the licenses of both petitioners. The cancellation orders were based on a report from the Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, Jamkhed, but no show cause notice was issued to the petitioners prior to the cancellation, nor were they afforded any opportunity of hearing. The petitioners challenged these cancellation orders by filing Criminal Writ Petition No.2029 of 2019 and Criminal Writ Petition No.102 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court considered the submissions of the petitioners' advocates, Mr. J. V. Patil and Mr. P. R. Katneshwarkar, and the respondents' advocates, Ms. V. S. Choudhary (APP for State) and Mr. S. S. Thombre (for Grampanchayat). The court observed that the cancellation of a license without prior notice and hearing is a clear violation of the principles of natural justice. The court held that the impugned orders are unsustainable and liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the court allowed both writ petitions and quashed the cancellation orders dated 29-11-2019. The court directed that the licenses shall be restored, but clarified that the authorities are at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, if any adverse action is contemplated in future.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - Cancellation of License - The District Magistrate cancelled the performance licenses of the petitioners without issuing any show cause notice or affording an opportunity of hearing, which is a clear violation of the principles of natural justice. The court held that the order of cancellation is unsustainable and liable to be set aside. (Paras 1-10)

B) Entertainment Law - Performance License - Tamasha Rules - The licenses were granted under the Rules For Licensing And Controlling Places Of Public Amusements (Other Than Cinemas) And Performances For Public Amusement, Including Cabaret Performances, Discotheque, Games, Pol Game Parlours, Amusement Parlours Providing Computer Games, Virtual Reality Games, Cyber Cafes, Games With net Connectivity, Bowling Alleys, Card Rooms, Social Clubs, Sports Clubs, Melas And Tamashas Rules, 1960. The cancellation was based on a report of the Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, but no prior notice was given to the petitioners. The court held that the cancellation without hearing is illegal. (Paras 1-10)

C) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 144 - The District Magistrate had also issued an order under Section 144 of CrPC, but the court noted that the cancellation of licenses was independent of that order. The court did not delve into the merits of the Section 144 order. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cancellation of performance licenses granted to the petitioners under the Rules For Licensing And Controlling Places Of Public Amusements (Other Than Cinemas) And Performances For Public Amusement, Including Cabaret Performances, Discotheque, Games, Pol Game Parlours, Amusement Parlours Providing Computer Games, Virtual Reality Games, Cyber Cafes, Games With net Connectivity, Bowling Alleys, Card Rooms, Social Clubs, Sports Clubs, Melas And Tamashas Rules, 1960, by the District Magistrate without issuing any show cause notice or affording an opportunity of hearing is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both writ petitions are allowed. The impugned orders dated 29-11-2019 passed by the District Magistrate/Collector, Ahmednagar are quashed and set aside. The licenses of the petitioners shall be restored. However, the authorities are at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, if any adverse action is contemplated in future.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Cancellation of License Without Notice
  • Section 144 CrPC
  • Performance License
  • Tamasha Rules
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (02) 11

Criminal Writ Petition No.2029 of 2019 and Criminal Writ Petition No.102 of 2020

2021-02-09

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi

Mr. J. V. Patil, Mr. P. R. Katneshwarkar, Ms. V. S. Choudhary, Mr. S. S. Thombre

Renuka Sanskritik Kala Kendra, Through Its Proprietor Jyoti Motambai Pawar; Natraj Sanskrutik Kala Kendra, Through Its Proprietor Smt. Mangal Popat Jadhav

The State of Maharashtra, Through The Additional District Magistrate, Dist. Ahmednagar; The Collector, Ahmednagar; The Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar; The Tahsildar & Executive Magistrate, Jamkhed; Grampanchayat Moha, Through Its Sarpanch

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petitions challenging cancellation of performance licenses by District Magistrate.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the cancellation orders dated 29-11-2019 and restoration of licenses.

Filing Reason

Licenses cancelled without show cause notice or hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

District Magistrate/Collector, Ahmednagar passed orders on 29-11-2019 cancelling the performance licenses of the petitioners.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of performance licenses without issuing show cause notice or affording opportunity of hearing is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the cancellation orders were passed without any prior notice or hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Respondents argued that the cancellation was based on a report from the Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate and was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

Cancellation of a license without prior notice and opportunity of hearing is a clear violation of the principles of natural justice and renders the order unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners in both the writ petitions are challenging the order passed by the respondent No.2 District Magistrate / Collector, Ahmednagar bearing Outward No.D.C./Karya-9D/1076/2019, dated 29-11-2019 and D.C./Karya-9D/1075/2019 of the same date, thereby cancelling the performance licences granted to the petitioners under the Rules For Licensing And Controlling Places of Public Amusements (Other Than Cinemas) And Performances For Public Amusement, Including Cabaret Performances, Discotheque, Games, Pol Game Parlours, Amusement Parlours Providing Computer Games, Virtual Reality Games, Cyber Cafes, Games With net Connectivity, Bowling Alleys, Card Rooms, Social Clubs, Sports Clubs, Melas And Tamashas Rules, 1960.

Procedural History

The petitioners were granted performance licenses under the Tamasha Rules. On 29-11-2019, the District Magistrate/Collector, Ahmednagar passed orders cancelling the licenses. The petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition No.2029 of 2019 and Criminal Writ Petition No.102 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the cancellation orders. The court heard the matter and reserved judgment on 05-01-2021, pronouncing it on 09-02-2021.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Dowry Harassment in Bride Burning Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 302, 498A, 201 IPC. The court held that the last seen theory and the failure of the appell...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Performance Licenses for Tamasha Troupes — Violation of Natural Justice. Licenses Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing Under Tamasha Rules, 1960.