Search Results for "reopen assessment"

386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Prior Recording of Reasons. Reopening under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Reasons Not Recorded Before Issuance of Notice.

The petitioner, M/s. Indusind Media & Communications Ltd., filed its return of income for assessment year 2007-08, which was revised and subsequently ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Same Facts as Original Assessment Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Noshir Darabshaw Talati, an individual assessed to income tax for over three decades, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material — Reopening Based on Investigation Report Already Considered During Scrutiny Assessment is Invalid Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, D.K. Realty India Private Limited, challenged a notice dated 30 March 2021 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Income Tax Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years.

The petitioners, Sanjeevkumar Kabra and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Concealment of Income in Land Sale Transaction. Assessee failed to disclose receipt of advance sale consideration in return, leading to penalty for concealment.

The appellant-assessee, along with four others, executed an agreement for sale of a plot of land at Vasai on 07.12.2004 for a total consideration of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasons to Believe Income Escaped Assessment. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion Regarding Cost of Acquisition Under Section 55(2)(b)(ii) is Invalid.

The petitioner, J.B. Amin & Brothers (HUF), owned land at Aurangpura, Aurangabad, purchased by late Balubhai Amin for Rs.1,80,000. After his death in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices for HUF Assessee in Income Tax Case — Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Notices under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 set aside as reasons for reopening were based on mere change of opinion and not on fresh tangible material.

The petitioner, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) carrying on cotton ginning and pressing business, challenged four notices dated 30 March 2004 issued un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reassessment Notices for Non-Disclosure of Reasons. Failure to Supply Recorded Reasons Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Violates Natural Justice and Renders Reopening Invalid.

The petitioner, Ajay Oxycholoride Floorings, a partnership firm, challenged two notices dated 20th February 1990 and 3rd June 1991 issued by the Assis...