Search Results for "redevelopment scheme challenge"

308 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 308 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Municipal Corporation in MRTP Act Notice Case — Notice Under Section 89 MRTP Act Held Valid and Not Barred by Limitation. The Court set aside the trial court decree declaring the notice invalid, finding that the notice was within limitation but the suit was premature.

The appellant, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, filed a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the oral ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Acquisition Order Under MHADA Act Due to Non-Compliance and Delay. Land Acquisition Proposal Sanctioned in 2006 Set Aside as Authority Failed to Complete Acquisition Within Reasonable Period, Rendering the Order Unenforceable.

The petitioners, H.I.M.S. Botawala Charities (a public charitable trust) and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Eviction Order Against 80-Year-Old Tenant in MHADA Redevelopment Dispute. Petitioner's Right to Alternate Accommodation Under Section 95A of MHADA Act Upheld as Board Failed to Provide Permanent Rehabilitation Before Eviction.

The petitioner, Sugrabai Gulam Abas Tambawala, an 80-year-old housewife, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sale of Trust Property by Board of Trustees. Court holds that sale sanctioned by court under Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 cannot be challenged by beneficiaries who were not parties to the original proceedings.

The present petition was filed by S.S. Mhatre and others seeking recall and setting aside of an order dated 11.1.1994 passed in Misc. Petition No. 43 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Slum Rehabilitation Tenement Dispute. Court holds that Trial Court erred in not considering balance of convenience and irreparable loss while rejecting injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The appellants, Fayzan Khan, Devendra Mishra, Firoz Ismail Khan, and Rajesh Kanojiya, filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Dindoshi seeking a decla...