Search Results for "excess salary recovery"

202 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 202 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Challenge to Labour Court and Gratuity Proceedings. Ex-Manager's Claims Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act and Payment of Gratuity Act Dismissed as Society is Neither an 'Industry' Nor an 'Establishment'.

The Petitioner, Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is a cooperative housing society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by School Head Master in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established. Commissioner's Award of Rs.5,38,200/- with 12% Interest Upheld as Deceased Driver Was Under Control and Supervision of School.

The appellant, the Head Master of Balmi Primary School, filed an appeal under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Judicial Scrutiny of RBI's Supersession of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank's Board. Balance between Constitutional mandates and banking regulations reaffirmed.

The Bombay High Court assessed the legality of the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) supersession of the Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquitted Accused's Writ Petition for Rs.200 Crore Compensation as Acquittal Does Not Automatic Entitlement. The Court Holds That Compensation Under Article 226 Requires Proof of Malicious Prosecution and Violation of Fundamental Rights, Not Mere Acquittal.

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was filed by the peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Injury Not Arising Out of Employment. Seaman's Back Injury While Shifting Food Boxes Held Not Covered Under Section 3 of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 as Injury Did Not Arise Out of and in Course of Employment.

The case involves an appeal by M/s Denklay Marine Services Ltd. and M/s Orinoco Marine Consultancy India Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment and order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Executing Court's Reduction of Decreed Interest Rate. Executing Court Cannot Vary Terms of Decree Under Section 34 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioner, Joaquim Joao Fernandes, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 4-1-2005 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Margao i...