Search Results for "Section 14-A"

221 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 221 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Bail in SC/ST Act Case Despite Alleged Suppression of Criminal Antecedents — High Court's Suo Motu Recall of Bail Order Set Aside. Court held that recall of bail without any allegation of violation of bail conditions or misuse of liberty was improper.

The appellant, Mendar Singh @ Vijay Singh, was accused of offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 27 of the Arms Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction for Restoration of Possession in Suit for Specific Performance and Possession — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in His Favor.

The plaintiff filed an interim application seeking temporary injunction for restoration of possession of the suit premises during the pendency of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction on Construction. Court holds that the appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction by granting ad-interim injunction without considering balance of convenience and prima facie case.

The petitioner, Radhika Property Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consent Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — No Fraud or Collusion Found in Consent Terms Filed by Counsel. Consent decree upheld as valid and binding under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The petitioners, Dhanaji Kashinath Shendkar and others, filed writ petitions challenging a consent decree passed in a suit for specific performance. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Discrepancies in Evidence of Food Inspectors and Failure to Obtain Panch Signature on Samples Led to Acquittal Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order of the Judicial Magistrate, F.C. Kudal, in Regular Criminal Case No. 73 of 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings for Possession of Gutka for Sale Under Section 273 IPC — Gutka Not an Article of Food. Possession of Gutka for sale does not constitute an offence under Section 273 IPC as Gutka is not an article of food under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The case involves two criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioners, who were accused of possessing Gutka for sale, which was alleged to be an offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when both lower courts have concurrently found that the appellant failed to prove title or adverse possession over the suit property.

The appellant, Dilipkumar Bherumal Kucheriya, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment ...