Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Rule 10(3)"
1936 result(s) found
Found 1936 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Electoral Roll Deletions for Lack of Alternative Remedy. Petitioners failed to avail statutory remedy under Section 22 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 before approaching High Court under Article 226.
23 Apr 2015The petitioners, 25 residents of Ashok Nagar, Dhamangaon Railway, Amravati, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befor...
- 136
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notice and Order by MCGM in Alleged Unauthorized Construction Case Finding Malafide Action. The Court held that the works were not in progress and the action under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 constituted legal malice.
27 Nov 2020The petitioner, a film actor, purchased a bungalow in Bandra, Mumbai in 2017. In 2018, she carried out a structural audit and sought permission from t...
- 73
High Court
- 61
High Court
SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009
8 Feb 2019The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...
- 90
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.
3 Oct 2024The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...
- 487
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Appeal in RERA Case for Delay in Possession — Promoter Liable for Interest Under Section 18 of RERA Act, 2016. The court restored the order of TN RERA directing the promoter to pay interest for delay in handing over possession of flat and club house facilities.
10 Jan 2025The appellant, a retired General Manager of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, entered into a Memorandum of Agreement on 30.07.2011 with the respon...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment on Cross Appeals Against Order Partly Setting Aside Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute. The Court examines whether the Single Judge correctly assessed claims arising from a Build-Operate-Transfer road project, considering the State's argument on suppressed Office Note and extension of toll collection period.
4 May 2018These appeals arise out of a common order of a single Judge of the High Court dated 12 February 2015 in three arbitration petitions challenging an arb...
- 68
High Court
KAHC010138832018_1
14 Jan 2019The judgment relates to a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging notifications issued by the State Government's ...
- 42
High Court
- 91
