KAHC010138832018_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment relates to a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging notifications issued by the State Government's Department of Urban Development. The notifications, dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018, pertained to the reservation of wards for elections in various urban local bodies across Karnataka, including Mangalore City Corporation, Madikere Municipality, Harapanahalli Town Municipal Council, Tiptur City Municipal Council, Bhadravathi City Municipal Council, and others. The petitioners, who were individuals aspiring to contest elections or affected by the reservation, contended that the reservation process was arbitrary and violated constitutional and statutory mandates. The writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking quashing of the impugned notifications and a direction to reallocate reservations in a lawful manner. The lead petition was W.P. No.44499/2018, and numerous connected matters were heard together. The petitioners were represented by various advocates, while the State was represented by an Additional Advocate General and the Election Commission by senior counsel. The court considered the common issues and delivered a unified order. The full text of the judgment, including the reasoning and final directions, is not available in the provided excerpt.

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010138832018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 31

W.P. No.44499/2018 (LB-ELE) c/w W.P. No.50796/2018, W.P. Nos.53609-53611/2018, W.P. No.54664/2018, W.P. No.43519/2018, W.P. No.44520/2018, W.P. Nos.50791-50794/2018, W.P. Nos.51593-51596/2018, W.P. No.50447/2018, W.P. No.53599/2018, W.P. No.38720/2018, W.P. No.35959/2018, W.P. No.53832/2018, and other connected writ petitions

2019-01-14

S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Sri Abishek Marla M.J., Sri Ashok Haranahalli, Sri Rajaram Sooryambail, Sri Dhananjay Kumar, Sri Udaya Prakash Muliya, Sri Rahul S. Reddy, Sri Devi Prasad Shetty, Sri S. Basavaraj, Sri M. Ravindranath, Sri Naveen J.N., Sri Nagarajappa A., Sri Mahesh R. Uppin, and others for petitioners; Sri K.N. Phaneendra, Senior Counsel; Sri Dinesh Rao, Additional Advocate General; Smt. Vaishali Hegde, Smt. Prathima Honnapura, Sri Vishwajith Shetty, Sri S. Rajashekar, Sri R. Subramanya, Sri D.C. Jagadeesh, Smt. Anusuya Devi, and others for respondents

Mr. Ravindra Nayak and Others (multiple petitioners)

State of Karnataka, Karnataka State Election Commission, Mangalore City Corporation, and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Constitutional challenge to reservation notifications for urban local body elections

Remedy Sought

Quashing of impugned notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 and consequential directions

Filing Reason

The petitioners contended that the reservation process was arbitrary, illegal, and violative of constitutional and statutory provisions

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging reservation notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 issued by the State of Karnataka, Department of Urban Development. The High Court clubbed all petitions and heard them together on 14.01.2019.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court KAHC010138832018_1
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder by Burning Wife. Accused-Appellant Challenges Reliability of Dying Declarations and Alleged Motive in Section 302 IPC Case.