Search Results for "Organized crime"

221 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 221 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Default Bail Computation Issue to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Precedents. The Court Examines Whether Date of Remand is Included or Excluded in Calculating 60/90-Day Period Under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for Entitlement to Default Bail.

The Supreme Court addressed a reference concerning the computation of the remand period for default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cross FIRs Between Two Groups of Advocates Over Incident at Police Station. Both FIRs Found Vague and Amounting to Abuse of Process of Law Under Section 482 CrPC.

The case involves two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of two cross FIRs regist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Withdrawal of Benefits to Family of Deceased Police Constable. Death During Rescue Operation in Naxalite Area Held to Be 'In Action' Under Government Resolution Dated 29.11.2008.

The petitioners, the mother and wife of deceased Sanjay Santosh Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra to w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Alleged Maoist Members in UAP Act Case — Insufficient Evidence of Terrorist Activity. Mere Membership of Banned Organization Without Active Participation Does Not Attract Stringent Bail Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

The judgment concerns two bail applications filed by Jyoti Babasaheb Chorge (Accused No.4) and Sushma Hemant Ramtekke (Accused No.2) in Sessions Case ...