Search Results for "Irrelevant considerations"

626 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 626 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Ulhasnagar Development Plan, Upholds Statutory Process. Court holds that objections to draft development plan must be raised before the planning authority under MRTP Act, and belated challenges after final notification are not maintainable.

The judgment concerns two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the development plan for Ulhasnagar city. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging NOC Requirement for Construction Near Naval Area. Court holds that the requirement of NOC from Naval authorities for construction within 500 meters of naval installation is valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, Dolby Builders Private Ltd. and its shareholder Girish Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging the requirement of a No Objection C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reservation Condition in Development Permission Dispute. MHADA Housing Reservation Deleted by Sanctioned Modification to Development Plan, Municipal Corporation Cannot Insist on Compliance.

The petitioner, Cosmos Constructions, a partnership firm, owned land at Chitalsar, Manpada, Thane. The Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) imposed Condi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes DGFT Order Cancelling Advance Authorisation and EPCG Licences for Optical Fibre Manufacturer — Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind. Petitioner's licences restored as cancellation was based on irrelevant considerations and without proper hearing.

The petitioner, Ashwini Ashish Dighe, proprietor of Sunteck Telecommunications, a manufacturer of optical fibres, filed a writ petition challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Compassionate Appointment Based on Ad-Hoc Promotee Father's Service. Compassionate appointment scheme does not extend to dependents of ad-hoc promotees whose promotion was never confirmed.

The petitioner, Nikhil Maruti Gosarade, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 25 June 2018, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Fatal Assault Case at Court Complex — Common Intention Established Under Section 149 IPC. Appellants convicted for murder and other offences based on consistent eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, with no merit found in defence of false implication.

The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals against a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had upheld the conviction of the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Against Subsistence Allowance Order in De Novo Enquiry. Employee dismissed after departmental enquiry is entitled to subsistence allowance during de novo proceedings before Labour Court under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioner, Mumbai Cricket Association, challenged an order of the 12th Labour Court, Bombay, dated 15th October 2010, which directed the payment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CAT Order Directing Stepping Up of Increment in Pay Fixation — Overstay Period Not Relevant for Increment Date. The court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal's order was based on irrelevant considerations and set it aside.

The petitioners, the Director of National Institute of Virology and others, challenged the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal which directed...