Search Results for "Compulsory Acquisition"

529 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 529 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Petitioners Against Union of India and NHAI -- Challenge to Land Acquisition Under National Highways Act, 1956 Fails -- Section 94 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable

The petitioners, owners of galas in Godown L1, challenged NHAI's acquisition of part of the godown for the Vadodara Mumbai Expressway under the Nation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Land Reserved for Garden Since 1976 — Award Under Section 23 of RFCTLARR Act 2013 Quashed as Acquisition Not Completed Within Statutory Period

The petitioners, owners of land in Kankavali, challenged the reservation of their land for a garden under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 14 and 17 of Maharashtra Slum Act in Land Acquisition Challenge. Challenge to Acquisition Under Section 14 and Award Under Section 17 Rejected as Provisions Held Intra Vires Constitution.

The petitioners, Nenshi Monji (Bombay), a Family Trust and Others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the acquisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Under National Highways Act — Petitioner Failed to Establish Ownership of Property. Burden of proof lies on petitioner to establish ownership for maintainability of writ under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, SND Sampath, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes LAO's Apportionment Order in Highway Acquisition — Directs Reference to Civil Court Under Section 19C(4) of Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Dispute over compensation apportionment between partnership firm and its individual partners requires adjudication by civil court, not LAO.

The petitioners, Pravin Girish Chamaria and Nishit Bechar Patel, along with respondents 4 and 5 (Dilip Prabhakar Kudalkar and Jagdish Shashikumar Raje...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Case - Applications for Re-determination of Compensation Held Time-Barred. Limitation under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, not extended to claimants who failed to apply for certified copy of Court's award.

The acquiring body, the Executive Engineer of Jalna Minor Irrigation Division, filed writ petitions challenging awards passed under Section 28A of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for BAPS Temple Construction — Acquisition Upheld as Valid Public Purpose Under MRTP Act, 1966. Petitioners lacked locus standi and filed petition after 10-year delay, leading to dismissal.

The petitioners, Mr. Salim Naim Khan and Mrs. Reshma Salim Khan, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of land by the State of Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 73 OF 2015

...