Search Results for "Article 136 Constitution"

1427 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1427 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Interim Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Labour Court's Direction to Reinstate Workman with Full Wages Pending Complaint Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai dated 25th October 2005, which dismissed its revision...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Bail in Customs Act Case, Quashes Magistrate's Order Due to Illegal Arrest and Bailable Offence Classification. Petitioners Released on Bail with Conditions

The High Court of Bombay allowed a criminal writ petition challenging the denial of bail to petitioners accused under the Customs Act, 1962. The petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Filed by Convicts in Akshardham Temple Terror Attack Case. Appeals Challenge Convictions Under POTA, IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act for Conspiracy and Murder of 33 Persons.

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by the convicted accused-appellants challenging their conviction and sentences awarded by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Sales Tax Incentive Scheme. Retrospective Operation of Section 41B of Bombay Sales Tax Act and Rule 31AA Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Vested Rights.

The petitioners, M/s. Prasad Power Control Pvt. Limited and its director, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 41B of the Bombay Sales Ta...