Search Results for "Abandonment"

502 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 502 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Excess and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrator Entertained Claims Beyond Scope of Reference and Relied on Unproved Certificates, Rendering Award Patently Illegal.

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a construction dispute between Country Club (India) Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Family Dispute Over Partnership and Company Matters — Mediation Failed. Court holds that disputes arising from Deed of Family Settlement and Partnership Deed are arbitrable and that non-signatory companies can be joined as parties to arbitration.

The case involves two groups of the same family, the CPS group (Chandrakant Phoolchand Sanghvi and others) and the APS group (Anilkumar Phoolchand San...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in MCGM Contract Dispute. Court Holds That Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days of Notice Entities Applicant to Court-Appointed Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, Kalpataru Projects International Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Between Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos.8-11 in Property Suit — Consent Terms Accepted Despite Objections from Other Defendants. Partial Settlement Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Does Not Affect Rights of Non-Settling Defendants Who May Continue to Contest the Suit.

The suit was filed by 35 plaintiffs seeking a declaration that they are purchasers of certain property. The matter was listed for settlement as the pl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Interim Application in Suit for Specific Performance of Family Settlement Minutes. Interim Injunction Sought to Restrain Defendants from Valuing or Buying Out Shareholding Pending Suit for Enforcement of Minutes of Discussion.

The dispute arose in the context of a family-run private limited company engaged in automobile dealerships across multiple states. The Plaintiffs and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Application to Reopen Evidence in Civil Suit. Trial Court's Discretion Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Upheld as Defendants Had Sufficient Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witness.

The petitioners, who were the original defendants in Special Civil Suit No.74/2010 pending before the Second Joint Civil Judge, Satara, filed four wri...