Search Results for "wrong rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "wrong rule"

4896 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4896 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-Lifting of Liquor. The court heard arguments on additional grounds after noting that the issue was covered by a previous order in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Case.

18 Aug 2017

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of connected writ petitions filed by several CL-9 licence holders, including M/s. High Point Hotels Pvt. Ltd...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against DRAT Order Rejecting Additional Evidence Application on Technical Ground. Wrong Mention of Provision Does Not Oust Jurisdiction if Court Otherwise Has Power to Entertain Application.

28 Jan 2016

The petitioner, Neuropsychiatry and Critical Care Hospital Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-lifting of Liquor by CL-9 Licensees. Court Decides in Light of Earlier Decision in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant, Allowing Petitioners to Raise Further Grounds.

18 Aug 2017

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by various CL-9 license holders, including bars and restaurants, challenging the imposition o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Complaint Under Section 340 CrPC Against Party and Counsel for Alleged False Pleadings — Prima Facie Satisfaction Insufficient Without Proper Inquiry. Court holds that mere prima facie view that 'wrong statements' were made in pleadings prepared by counsel does not justify directing prosecution under Sections 193, 199, 200 IPC without a proper inquiry under Section 340 CrPC.

21 Jul 2026

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the respondents against the predecessor-in-title of the first appellant, seeking to restrain obstruction to...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines blocking of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A of CGST Rules. Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenge orders blocking electronic credit ledger without hearing, contending violation of natural justice and fundamental rights.

27 Jul 2023

The writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, by several pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Strike Out Pleadings in Election Petition Alleging Non-Disclosure of Assets and Criminal Cases. Court holds that allegations of suppression of material information in election affidavits constitute triable issues under Section 100(1)(d)(i) and (iv) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 and cannot be struck out at preliminary stage.

17 Feb 2011

The Bombay High Court dismissed an application filed by the original respondent (the elected candidate) seeking to strike out paragraphs 12 to 18 of t...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Interim Stay of Excise Rule Amendments. State Challenges Ad Interim Order Staying Amended Rules 5 and 5-A of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968, Introduced by Second Amendment Rules, 2025.

15 Apr 2026

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 against an ad interim order dated 25.11.2025 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Regulation 104, Holds No Revaluation Exceptional Circumstances After Supreme Court Upheld Regulation. Court cannot order revaluation of answer sheets under Regulation 104 of the Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Regulations, 1977, even in exceptional cases, after the Supreme Court upheld its validity in Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education v. Paritosh Bhupesh Kurmarsheth.

2 Feb 2006

The case involves a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court to a larger bench due to disagreement with an earlier Division Bench d...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act and Rule 8(4) of MCR Rules, 2016. Petition Seeks Execution of Mining Lease Deed and Challenges Orders of Union and State Governments.

18 Mar 2026

The petitioner, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (originally ABG Cement Ltd., later Vadraj Cement Ltd.), filed a writ petition befor...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)