Search Results for "wildlife permission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "wildlife permission"

129 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

20 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Wildlife Researchers in Forest Offence Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 64 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 Renders Prosecution Invalid. The court held that the petitioners, being public servants engaged in forest conservation research, were entitled to protection from prosecution without prior sanction.

4 Apr 2013

The petitioners, nine individuals associated with the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and Environment (ATREE) and other wildlife research organiz...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Stone Quarry Lease Holders Against NGT Order Prohibiting Mining in Elephant Corridor. The Court upheld the National Green Tribunal's directions to ban mining activities in the Similipal-Hadagarh-Kuldiha-Similipal elephant corridor and to complete the process for declaring a conservation reserve under Section 36 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, based on environmental and wildlife conservation concerns.

2 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from an original application filed by Rural Organisation for Social Empowerment before the National Green Tribunal, seeking cancella...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision Against Sessions Court's Reversal of Cognizance in Wildlife Offence Case. Trial Court's Order Taking Cognizance Under Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 Restored as Sessions Court Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction.

22 Jul 2021

The State of Karnataka, represented by the State Public Prosecutor, filed a criminal revision petition under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Crimi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows NGO's Writ Petition for Tree Plantation on Government Land Under Environmental Law — Directs Authorities to Consider Representation for Environmental Conservation. The court held that while a writ of mandamus cannot compel a specific action, the State must consider the petitioner's request for tree plantation in a reasonable manner.

23 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Nature Lovers Club, a registered NGO based in Ahmednagar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tata Power to Implement 220 KV Transmission Line Project Subject to Compliance with Environmental and Forest Laws. The court directed the respondents to allow implementation of the project in public interest, subject to conditions including compensatory afforestation and mangrove protection.

2 Mar 2022

The petitioners, The Tata Power Company Limited and a shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direct...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Closure of Byculla Zoo for Failing to Meet Modern Standards of Animal Welfare and Conservation. Zoo's antiquated conditions violate fundamental duty of compassion under Article 51-A(g) of the Constitution and provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.

18 Jul 2005

The Bombay High Court delivered an oral judgment on July 18, 2005, in a public interest litigation filed by People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Mining Prohibition in Eco-Sensitive Zones Near Protected Areas. Mining activities are barred within one kilometer from Protected Area boundaries, irrespective of Eco-Sensitive Zone notifications by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, to prevent environmental damage.

28 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court, in a clarification application, addressed the permissibility of mining activities in relation to Protected Areas and Eco-Sensitive ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revocation of Environmental Clearance for Granite Quarrying Near Bannerghatta National Park. Environmental Clearance Restored as Eco-Sensitive Zone Notification dated 11.03.2020 Limits Mining Prohibition to Notified 100-Meter Zone, Not One-Kilometer Buffer.

12 Jul 2021

The petitioner, owner of patta land in Herandyapanahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, was granted a work order on 14.01.2016 under Rule 32(1) of the Kar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Jun 2022

This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)