Search Results for "waging war against state"

21 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by Calcutta High Court in Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case — CBI Investigation Undermined by Premature Release. Reverse Burden of Proof Under Section 436A CrPC Not Applicable Where Investigation Ongoing and Trial Not Commenced.

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against the grant of bail to multiple accused persons in connection with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Maharashtra Police Academy Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Held that the Industrial Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a complaint under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 as the petitioner is not an 'industry' under the Act.

The present Writ Petition was filed by the Maharashtra Police Academy (Petitioner) challenging the Judgment dated 09.02.2025 passed by the Industrial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Bar Council Notice for Lack of Jurisdiction in Professional Misconduct Complaint — Complaint Filed by Judgment Debtor Against Decree Holder's Advocate Not Maintainable Under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961

The petitioner, Sri Paras Jain, an advocate practicing in Bengaluru for 44 years, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Convicts Contemnors for Scandalous Allegations Against Judges in Suo Motu Contempt Proceedings. The Court upheld its inherent power under Article 129 to punish for contempt, rejecting procedural objections under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The Supreme Court of India initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Vijay Kurle, Rashid Khan Pathan, and Nilesh Ojha for sending letters contai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Parity with Co-Accused and Delay in Trial. Applicant, in custody since 2008, granted bail as trial not commenced and case similar to co-accused who was already bailed.

The applicant, Afroz Firoz Mujawar @ Dastagir, was accused No. 19 in MCOC Act Special Case No. 4 of 2009 pending before the Special Court under the MC...