Search Results for "suspended employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "suspended employee"

622 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 622 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Writ Petition for Salary During Suspension After Honourable Acquittal. Held that Honourable Acquittal in Criminal Case Entities Teacher to Full Salary for Suspension Period Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

28 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Narsing Shankarrao Shivshette, was appointed as an Assistant Secondary Teacher in a private school run by respondent No.1 society and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension Order of PMC Employee Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 4(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (C.C.A.) Rules, 1979. Suspension order set aside as disciplinary authority failed to record satisfaction that continued presence of employee would hamper investigation.

16 Oct 2025

The Petitioner, Lalit Ramkrushna Bode, an employee of the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC), was suspended by an order dated 10/02/2025 issued by the A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Employee in Service Law Dispute Over Denial of Salary for Suspension Period. Appellate Authority's Order Treating Suspension Period as Dies Non After Setting Aside Removal Found Impermissible Under Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970.

3 Mar 2022

The dispute involved an employee appointed as a Clerk in the State Transport Department in 1979, who faced criminal cases leading to suspension and re...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension Order of Executive Engineer in KRIDL Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Reasons. Suspension order set aside as it was passed mechanically without considering the employee's explanation and without recording reasons as required under Rule 3(2) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966.

8 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Sri. Zaranappa Chincholikar, an Executive Engineer with Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL), challenged an orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Granting Back Wages to Employee Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Punishment Order Stopping Increments Does Not Deprive Employee of Full Wages for Suspension Period, Labour Court Has Jurisdiction to Compute Benefits.

27 Nov 2012

The Jain Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its CEO filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 14-10-2008 passed by the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Partially Allows Petition in Service Law Dispute Regarding Suspension Period Treatment. Court holds that acquittal does not automatically entitle full backwages during suspension, but directs treatment of suspension period as duty for qualifying service and pension purposes under Regulation 75 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation (Service) Regulations, 1989.

25 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a petition filed by a former employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) seeking a direction to treat his susp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Ordnance Factory Labourer Seeking Full Salary for Suspension Period Following Acquittal — Period of Suspension Must Be Treated as Duty for All Purposes Under Fundamental Rule 54-B(3) When Acquittal Is Based on Full Trial on Merits.

5 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Gopal S/o Sitaram Bairisal, a retired labourer from Ordnance Factory, Ambazari, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Cen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension Order for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Periodic Review Under Rule 98 of Karnataka Civil Services Rules. Suspension of Legislative Assembly Secretary Set Aside Due to Failure of Disciplinary Authority to Review Suspension at Prescribed Intervals and Prolonged Suspension Without Completing Inquiry, Directing Reinstatement with Backwages.

2 Jul 2020

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by a Secretary of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly Secretariat challenging his sus...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Treating Suspension Period as Qualifying Service for Pension. The Court held that under Rules 37 and 50 of the Railway Service (Pension) Rules, 1993, an employee compulsorily retired is entitled to have the suspension period counted as qualifying service for pension.

4 Feb 2014

The respondent, J.S. Kharat, was employed by the Central Railway since 1964 as a Driver 'C'. On 25.12.1985, he was placed under suspension due to invo...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Denial of Back Wages During Deemed Suspension. Deemed Suspension Under Rule 34(2)(a) of Karnataka Educational Institutions (Collegiate Education) Rules, 2003 Does Not Require Prior Approval and Principle of No Work No Pay Applies When Criminal Case Is Not at Employer's Instance.

22 Oct 2020

The petitioner, a lecturer in a private aided college, was convicted in a criminal case under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC arising from a prop...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)