Search Results for "royalty charges"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "royalty charges"

207 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.

13 Sep 2019

The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Commercial Arbitration Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award on Royalty Liability for Earthwork. Liability for Royalty on Ordinary Earth Used in Embankment Held by Arbitral Tribunal to be Borne by Employer, Section 34 Petition Filed Challenging Interpretation of Contract Clauses.

14 Nov 2025

The matter involved a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to a majority arbitral award dated 22nd May 2020 arisin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship Limited; Revenue Accepts That No Royalty Was Payable Under Race Promotion Contract. High Court Had Reversed AAR and Held That FOWC Had a Permanent Establishment in India Under Article 5 of the India-UK Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.

1 Aug 2026

The appeals arose from a tax dispute concerning the Formula One Grand Prix event in India. Formula One World Championship Limited (FOWC), a UK tax res...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.

15 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Filed by Court Receiver for Recovery of Royalty Arrears Against Vatsa Interiors P.Ltd. Under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the company is unable to pay its debts but granted a final opportunity to pay the principal amount in installments to avoid winding up.

11 Mar 2005

The Court Receiver, High Court, Mumbai filed a company petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of Vatsa Interior...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Income Tax Dispute Over Disallowance of Fees and Taxes Under Section 40(a)(iib) of Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that gallonage fee, licence fee, and shop rental for FL9 licences were disallowable as exclusive levies on a State Government undertaking, while those for FL1 licences were not exclusive, and surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax were not fees or charges under Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

3 Jan 2022

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Kerala in income tax matters involving Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing & Marketing ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Court Receiver's 1% Commission on Gross Sale Proceeds in Arbitration Matter — Receiver's Commission Not Subject to Deduction of Expenses. The Court held that the Court Receiver is entitled to 1% commission on the gross sale proceeds without deduction of expenses incurred by the receiver, as per the Bombay High Court (Court Receiver) Rules, 2012.

6 Oct 2015

The appellant, L & T Finance Limited, had advanced a loan of Rs 32,40,000 to AGT Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. for purchase of two vehicles under a loan-cu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Captive Power Producers in Hydel Policy Dispute Over Water Royalty Charges. The court held that the agreements incorporating the government policy did not impose water royalty liability on captive power producers, distinguishing them from independent power producers under the policy framework.

6 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by M/s. Indsil Hydro Power and Manganese Limited (INDSIL) and Carborundum Universal Limited (CUMI) against a comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Transaction Charges. Transaction charges paid to stock exchanges are not fees for technical services under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as stock exchanges perform regulatory and administrative functions.

21 Oct 2011

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the assessment y...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)