Search Results for "rectification order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "rectification order"

901 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 901 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes ITAT's Rectification Order in Income Tax Case — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 254(2) by Reviewing Its Own Decision. Mistake Apparent from Record Must Be Obvious and Not Require Re-appreciation of Evidence.

23 Sep 2023

The petitioner, M/s. I.G. Petrochemicals Ltd., an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 05.09.202...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Refund of Admitted Amount in Income Tax Rectification Order — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.833 Crores Under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the revenue cannot retain the admitted refund amount and directed refund within four weeks, subject to verification.

26 Jun 2020

The petitioner, Vodafone Idea Limited, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus for refund of Rs.1009,43,88,637/-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order in Police Service Matter — No Violation of Natural Justice Found. Transfer Order Corrected Due to Clerical Error Does Not Require Fresh Hearing as It Is an Administrative Decision.

9 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Sanjeev Bhagwanrao Kokil, a Senior Police Inspector, was initially transferred from M.R.A. Marg Police Station, Mumbai to Amravati Cit...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Transfer of Rectification Petitions Under Trade Marks Act; Statutory Rectification Jurisdiction Confined to High Court Exercising Appellate Jurisdiction over Appropriate Registry. Interpretation of Sections 47 and 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999, and Rule 4 of Trade Mark Rules, 2017, Precludes Exercise of Jurisdiction by High Court Over Entries Made by Another Registry.

20 Feb 2025

The petitioner, a company engaged in trade mark disputes, had filed a civil suit before the Madras High Court (Commercial Division) for infringement a...

High Court

Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Challenging De-occupation Notice and Directs Consideration of Rectification Plan. The Court directs verification of demolition plan in light of Government Order under Section 80-A of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, and stays coercive action pending decision.

20 Feb 2025

The petitioner, owner of property against which Greater Chennai Corporation issued a de-occupation notice on 26.12.2024 for unauthorised construction,...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Revenue's Revision in Sales Tax Case — Rectification Order Under Section 25-A of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 Cannot Be Used to Reopen Assessment on New Grounds After Expiry of Limitation. The court held that a rectification order cannot be used to review the merits of an assessment and that interest under Section 13-B cannot be levied on an invalid tax demand.

10 Nov 2017

The Revenue filed revision petitions under Section 23 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, challenging a common order of the Karnataka Appellate Trib...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

3 Aug 2019

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment in Plaint and Agreement in Specific Performance Suit. Court Has Power Under Section 26 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 to Rectify Instrument to Correct Clerical Error in Gat Number.

12 Dec 2011

The present writ petition was filed by the original defendant challenging the order of the trial court allowing the plaintiff's application for amendm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes ITAT Order Recalling Its Earlier Order Under Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act — Powers Limited to Rectification of Mistake Apparent from Record. The ITAT cannot re-hear the entire appeal on merits under the guise of rectification; the remedy against an erroneous order lies in appeal before the High Court.

3 Dec 2021

The case involves appeals by the Revenue against a common judgment of the Bombay High Court, which dismissed writ petitions challenging an order of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rectification Application by Applying Principles of Section 14 of Limitation Act to Section 35C(2) of Central Excise Act. Principles of Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963 are applicable to rectification applications under Section 35C(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, even though no express power to condone delay exists.

5 Oct 2017

The petitioners, IVP Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 6 March 2009...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)