Search Results for "railway consignment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "railway consignment"

40 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 22(c) and 29 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove supply or conspiracy beyond reasonable doubt.

3 Sep 2024

The appellant, Ajay Kumar Gupta, was accused no.2 in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The prosecution...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Railway Protection Force Constable for Gross Neglect of Duty and Abuse of Authority. High Court's Reinstatement Order Set Aside for Exceeding Writ Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence.

4 Dec 2020

The case arose from disciplinary proceedings against Rajendra Kumar Dubey, a Constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), who was charged with gro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Non-Delivery Case — Notice Under Section 106 of Railways Act, 1989 Must Be Liberally Constructed. The court held that the notice dated 25-01-1993 was valid and the claim was not barred by limitation, as the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to the Railway Claims Tribunal.

11 Oct 2013

The appellant, M/s. Sapna Emporium, filed a first appeal against the judgment and order dated 22-09-1995 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bombay...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railway Claims Tribunal Order in Tassar Silk Saree Loss Case — Limitation Period Under Section 103 of Railways Act, 1989 Is Not Applicable to Claims for Non-Delivery of Goods. The court held that Section 103 of the Railways Act, 1989 does not prescribe a period of limitation for filing a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, and the Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain claims beyond six months from the date of booking if within the Limitation Act, 1963.

28 Jun 2012

The appellant, Development Corporation of Vidarbha Limited, a Government of Maharashtra undertaking, filed two claim applications before the Railway C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Freight Refund Case. Refund of Rs.25,197 with interest upheld as Railways wrongly applied minimum rate condition for train load under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

29 Jun 2011

The Union of India appealed against the judgment and order dated 28th June 1993 of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bombay Bench, which directed the Railw...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway's Appeal in Goods Overcharge Claim — Burden of Proof on Carrier for Short Delivery Under Section 73 of Railways Act, 1989. The court upheld the Railway Claims Tribunal's award of compensation for short delivery of steel rails, holding that the railway failed to prove delivery in full.

16 Aug 2010

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India (representing South Eastern Railway, Central Railway, and South Eastern Railway) against an order of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Claim Case for Non-Delivery of Goods — Failure to Prove Exception Under Section 73 of Railways Act, 1989. Non-declaration of value under Section 77B of Indian Railways Act, 1890 does not absolve railway of liability for theft during transit; burden of proof on railway.

9 Mar 2010

The appellant, Mohandas Khandwani, proprietor of M/s. Krishna Kirana Stores, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, for non-deliver...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Short Delivery Claim — Appellant Entitled to Full Claim Amount Based on Bills and Shortage Certificate. The Court held that in the absence of challenge to the authenticity of bills, the Tribunal must accept them as proof of value, and the appellant need not produce books of account.

12 Jan 2010

The appellant, Shekhar Taneja, proprietor of M/s Ashoka Garments, Nagpur, purchased ready-made clothes from various dealers in Howrah and booked them ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railways Claims Tribunal Dismissal for Non-Joinder of Union of India. Misdescription of Party Held Curable; Claim for Lost Consignment Remanded for Fresh Adjudication.

5 Jan 2010

The appellants, Western Coalfields Ltd., filed a claim before the Railways Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, for non-delivery of a consignment of power cables ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Food Corporation of India Against Railway Claims Tribunal Order Dismissing Claim for Non-Compliance of Section 80 CPC. Notice Under Section 80 CPC Not Required for Claims Before Railway Claims Tribunal as It Is Not a Civil Court.

7 Feb 2006

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) filed a suit in the Civil Court at Jalgaon on 15.10.1981 for recovery of Rs.30,125/- due to short delivery of 241 ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)