Search Results for "previous owner's dues"

150 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Appellate Order in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Tampering. Disconnection of Electricity Supply Without Proof of Theft or Tampering Under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 Held Illegal.

The present petition was filed by Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd and another (the petitioners) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Customs Duty Priority Dispute Over Wound-Up Company's Hypothecated Goods. Held that customs authorities do not have priority over secured creditors under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 for sale of warehoused goods under Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal by Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) challenged the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court which held that customs authorities...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Addition of Party in Electricity Dues Suit. Addition of Petitioner as Defendant No.2 Upheld Under Order I Rule 10 CPC to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings and Effectuate Decree.

The petitioner, M/s Manidhari Air Products, challenged an order of the trial court allowing an application under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 151...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SFC's Claim for Priority Over Central Excise Dues in Recovery from Borrower's Assets. State Financial Corporation's Statutory Charge Under Section 29 of SFC Act, 1951 Prevails Over Crown Debt Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The petitioner, SICOM Ltd., a State Financial Corporation established under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, advanced a term loan of Rs. 51...