Search Results for "plastering work"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlady's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Tenant's Appeal Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 13(1)(a) of Bombay Rent Act. Tenant's Failure to Use Premises with Care and Damage to Property Justifies Eviction Under Section 108(o) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The Civil Revision Application was filed by the original Plaintiff/landlady, Sau. Suman Ramesh Samant, against the Respondent/original Defendant/tenan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorised Permanent Construction Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Tenant's temporary structure argument rejected as Appellate Court found MS angles, asbestos sheets, and polythene roof constituted permanent construction causing danger to building.

The case involves a dispute between the respondent-landlord, Kadambagiri Estates Pvt. Ltd., and the petitioner-tenant, Mrs. Binaifer Batiwala, over ev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Municipal Demolition Case — High Court Cannot Direct Reconstruction of Demolished Structure. The court held that the power to demolish illegal structures is vested in the municipal corporation and courts cannot direct reconstruction even if procedure was violated.

The case involves appeals by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against a High Court order directing reconstruction of a demolished structure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Classification Dispute. Construction of Shiv Chatrapati Sports Complex Held Not 'Commercial or Industrial Construction' Under Section 65(25b) of Finance Act, 1994.

The Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune-III filed an appeal under Section 35G(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Reconstruction of Servant Quarters in Cantonment Area. Reconstruction Without Prior Sanction Under Section 238 of Cantonments Act, 2006 Constitutes Unauthorized Construction Justifying Demolition Under Section 248(1).

The petitioner, an occupant of residential premises within the Pune Cantonment Board limits, obtained sanction for building plans on 6 May 2008 under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Land Compensation Enhancement in Acquisition for Rehabilitation. Market value fixed at Rs. 67,500 per hectare based on sale instances and land suitability under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two appeals arising from a judgment and award dated 30.11.1996 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Amravati in L.A.C. No.92/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Kadamba Transport Corporation in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation for Amputation of Thumb. Claimant's Income Assessed at Rs. 3,000 per Month Instead of Rs. 5,000, Multiplier Reduced from 16 to 11 Based on Age.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Santosh Anant Naik (respondent no.1/claimant) against Kadamba Transport Corporation Ltd. (appella...