Search Results for "performance security deposit"

477 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 477 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Contract. Court holds that Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 prescribing 3% performance guarantee is binding and demand for 10% is arbitrary.

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv & Sons, a proprietorship concern, responded to a tender notice dated 01.03.2023 issued by the Nagpur Division of Central Rai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demand for 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Tender. Court holds that demand for 10% performance guarantee instead of 3% as per Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 is arbitrary and unsustainable.

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv & Sons, a proprietory concern, participated in a tender issued by the Central Railway, Nagpur Division, for catering service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Security Deposit Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that the amount was a refundable security deposit and not a loan, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, A. S. Patel Trust and its trustees, challenged an arbitral award dated 12 October 2018 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Injunction Bank Guarantee Encashment in Commercial Dispute. No Case of Fraud or Irretrievable Injustice Made Out to Restrain Bank Guarantee Invocation Under Contract Law Principles.

The appeal arises from an order of the learned Single Judge refusing to grant an injunction restraining the respondent from encashing a bank guarantee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favor regarding the cancellation of tender acceptance and forfeiture of earnest money.

The appellant, Sunil Mantri Realty Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 29.09.2009 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division...