Search Results for "owner definition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "owner definition"

1743 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1743 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Rent Control Eviction Dispute — Landlord's Bonafide Need Not Established. Tenant's Right to Retention Upheld Under Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 as Landlord Failed to Prove Genuine Requirement and Tenant Would Suffer Greater Hardship.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute between the legal heirs of the original landlord (petitioners) and the tenant (respondent) over eviction from a premises g...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Due to Fraud and Leasehold Rights | Asian Chemical Industries Case (2026)

11 Feb 2026

The Bombay High Court, in M/s. Asian Chemical Industries v. Vijay Kailas Industrial Premises CHS Ltd. & Ors. (Writ Petition No. 11164 of 2024, dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition Challenging Deemed Conveyance Order in Favor of Cooperative Housing Society. Developer's Obligation to Transfer Land to Society Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 is Absolute and Not Subject to Limitation.

5 Apr 2023

The petitioners, K.V. Satyamurthy and S.M. Builders, were the owners and developers of a piece of land in Juhu, Mumbai. They constructed and sold 36 b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Eviction Orders under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. The dispute centered on whether Shop No. 8 in Indian Mercantile Mansion constituted public premises and whether the original tenant had unlawfully sublet the premises and permitted unauthorized structural changes, thereby rendering the occupants unauthorised under Section 2(g) of the Act.

28 Feb 2017

The dispute pertained to Shop No. 8, Ground Floor, Indian Mercantile Mansion, Mumbai, which was owned by the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd (Insurer),...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Holds That Right of a Mundkar in a Dwelling House Is Heritable Under Section 3 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. The court interpreted the definition of 'mundkar' to include family members and held that the right to occupy a dwelling house passes to legal heirs upon death.

18 Dec 2013

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed in the High Court of Bombay at Goa, which were heard together to decide the issue of the extent of heri...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deemed Owner's Liability Under Section 163-A MV Act. The court held that the insurer is liable to pay compensation to the legal heirs of a deceased occupant of a jeep under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the owner of the vehicle is deemed to be the insured and the policy covers all occupants.

18 Apr 2016

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 19.02.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Stepfather and Stepdaughter — Benami Transaction Claim Fails. The court held that the registered sale deed in the plaintiff's name establishes title, and the defendant's claim of benami ownership was not proved.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a property dispute between a stepfather (appellant/defendant) and his stepdaughter (respondent/plaintiff). The defendant married the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Case — Insurance Company Held Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Alleged Breach of Policy Conditions. The court held that the insurance company failed to prove that the driver did not have a valid driving license, thus the insurer is liable to pay compensation under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

26 Feb 2015

The appellant, owner of an autorickshaw, filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award date...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)