Search Results for "ordinary law sufficient"

4673 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4673 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Company Law Board's Power to Direct Issue of Shares Under Section 111 of Companies Act, 1956. The appeal raises the question whether the Board can order issuance of share certificates and rectification of register absent valid transfer documents.

This company appeal arose from an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 14 January 2013 in Company Petition No. 23 of 2012. The CLB had directed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010102062008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Reconsiders Validity of Appellate Side Rule on Marathi Translations After Earlier Division Bench Held It Unconstitutional. Larger Bench Examines Whether Litigants Were Heard Before Rule Declared Null and Void Under Article 348.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a practicing advocate who was prevented by the High Court Registry from filing a petition without first...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Section 34 Petition Against Foreign Award; Preliminary Objection Raised Pending Determination. Arbitration Agreement Existence and Enforcement of Foreign Award Under Part II Also Examined.

The dispute arose from a voyage charter party dated 13 September 2008 between Aurelia Reederei Eugen Friederich GmbH Schiffahrtsgesellschaft & Company...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...