KAHC010102062008_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010102062008_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (08) 33

W.P.No.30609/2008 c/w W.A.Nos.1477/2008 & 1286-1310/2011, W.P.Nos.11734/2008, 12612/2008, 14097/2008, 31026/2008, W.A.No.6121/2010, W.P.No.60096/2010

2018-08-10

B.V.Nagarathna, Aravind Kumar

S.S. Naganand, Arjun Rao, Maithreyi Bhat, H. Subramanya Jois, B.S. Vijayalakshmi, K.C. Shantha Kumar, Gowtham Chand, P.N. Rajeshwar, H.R. Narayana Rao, Abhinav Ramanand, Madhusudhan R. Naik, Vivek Holla, A.G. Holla, K.G. Raghavan, Ganapathi Hegde, P.N. Manmohan, K. Govinda Raj, Arun Shyam, Dinesh Muralidhar Bhat, A.R. Laxmi, G.N. Narasammannavar, Shamsundar S. Karanth, Rajanikant Kulkarni, M.V. Vedachala, S. Vijay Shankar, Subramanya Jois, V. Lakshminarayana, G. Lakshmeesh Rao, Yashodara Rao, M.S. Mohan

Sri Samsthana Mahabaleshwara Devaru, Sri Balachandra Vigneshwara Dixit

Secretary, Revenue Department (Endowment), Government of Karnataka and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to government order handing over temple administration to a mutt

Remedy Sought

Quashing of government order dated 12.08.2008 and restoration of temple administration to the previous board of trustees

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions and writ appeals were filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the government order dated 12.08.2008 which handed over the administration of Sri Mahabaleshwara Temple at Gokarna to Sri Ramachandrapura Mutt. These cases were clubbed together and heard by a Division Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
  • Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950:
  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court KAHC010102062008_1
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Bank Against Reinstatement of Dismissed Branch Manager in Disciplinary Proceedings Based on Admitted Misappropriation and Documentary Evidence. High Court Erred in Holding It a Case of No Evidence When Respondent Admitt...