Search Results for "oral examination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "oral examination"

8085 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8085 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Cross-Examine Autopsy Surgeon on Treatment Papers in Murder Trial — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Cross-Examination on Documents Not Formally Proved. The court held that the right of cross-examination is a valuable right and cannot be curtailed by a narrow interpretation of Section 294 CrPC, and the accused must be allowed to challenge the doctor's opinion on the basis of treatment papers produced by him.

13 Jan 2020

The petitioners, original accused in Sessions Case No. 153 of 2015 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, are charged under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Student's Petition Against Examination Cancellation for Violation of Natural Justice. Examination Cancellation Order Set Aside as Student Was Not Given Opportunity of Hearing Before Cancellation of Winter 2014 Examination and Debarment from Summer 2015 Examination.

27 Mar 2015

The petitioner, a student, challenged an order dated 13 January 2015 passed by the Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education (the Board) cancelli...

High Court

High Court Allows Defendant to Produce Documents in Cross-Examination Despite Non-Compliance with Order VIII Rule 1A(1) of CPC. Procedural Rules as Handmaid of Justice Permit Production for Limited Purpose of Confrontation When Documents Relate to Pleaded Facts and Are Not Foreign to Case.

4 Mar 2026

The petition was filed by defendant no. 1 challenging the trial court's order rejecting his application to produce documents to confront plaintiff no....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Ineligibility for Judicial Appointment Due to Absence in Examination, Not Failure. Distinction between 'failure' and 'absence' in examination eligibility criteria for appointment as Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class.

9 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Harsha d/o Bhikaji Gadekar, applied for the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class (CJJD and JMFC) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deferment of Cross-Examination in Sessions Case for Lack of Reasons Under Section 231(2) CrPC. Court holds that discretion to defer cross-examination must be exercised with reasons and not arbitrarily.

6 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Pradip Kundlikrao Kute, challenged an order dated 01.04.2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Basmathnagar in Sessions Case No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Legal Question on Production of Documents for Cross-Examination of Party Under CPC. The Court Interprets Order XIII Rule 1(3)(a) and Whether a Party is a 'Witness' for Purposes of Confronting with Documents Not Filed Earlier.

15 Sep 2017

This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenged an order dated 28 September 2016 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Divisi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Institutional Round Admissions in Medical Colleges; Petitioner Alleges Merit and Reservation Violations under Maharashtra Act XXVIII of 2015. The Court Examines Compliance with Admission Procedures Prescribed by State Common Entrance Test Cell Notices.

22 Oct 2019

The petitioner, an Indian citizen belonging to the Dhangar NT-2 category, appeared for the National Eligibility-Cum-Entrance Test (NEET-UG) 2019 and s...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging University Notification on Revaluation of PG Medical Answer Scripts — University Directed to Conduct Fresh Valuation by Different Examiners. The court held that the University's notification restricting revaluation to only one theory paper was arbitrary and violative of the right to fair evaluation under the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences Act.

27 Sep 2016

The petitioners, Dr. Haritha Ravipati and Mr. Mamidi Varun, were postgraduate medical students who appeared for the M.D. Dermatology examination condu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Regulation 104, Holds No Revaluation Exceptional Circumstances After Supreme Court Upheld Regulation. Court cannot order revaluation of answer sheets under Regulation 104 of the Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Regulations, 1977, even in exceptional cases, after the Supreme Court upheld its validity in Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education v. Paritosh Bhupesh Kurmarsheth.

2 Feb 2006

The case involves a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court to a larger bench due to disagreement with an earlier Division Bench d...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Circulars Mandating Public Examinations for 5th and 8th Standard Students. Petitioners Contend Circulars Violate Sections 16, 30, 38(4) of Right to Education Act, 2009 and Section 145 of Karnataka Education Act, 1983.

10 Mar 2023

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of four writ petitions filed by associations of unaided private schools and a parent of a fifth...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)