Search Results for "offences under securities law"

171 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging SEBI Summons Under Article 227 and BNSS 2023 — Summons Issued Without Proper Application of Mind Quashed. SEBI's Power Under Section 11(2) and 11(3) of SEBI Act, 1992 Must Be Exercised with Due Application of Mind and Not as a Routine Matter.

The petitioner, Neville Tuli, an entrepreneur aged 61, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 528 of the Bha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Non-Certification of Annexures to Return of Allotment Under Section 39(5) of Companies Act, 2013 — Default Under Section 39(4) Relates Only to Filing of Return, Not Certification of Annexures.

The petitioners, N.S.J.L Nidhi Ltd and its officers, challenged an order dated October 11, 2023, by which a Learned Adjudicating Officer imposed a pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging SEBI's Ex-Parte Interim Order in Securities Market Manipulation Case. Court upholds SEBI's power to issue ex-parte interim directions under Section 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 to protect market integrity.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by Hemant Kulshrestha and Vinay Bansal challenging an ex-parte interim order passed by the Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Settlement Regulations and Rejection of Settlement Proposal. Internal Committee's Power to Impose Conditions Precedent Upheld as Valid and Not Ultra Vires.

The petitioners, Abans Enterprises Ltd. and its promoter Abhishek Bansal, challenged the validity of regulations 6(1)(f) and 13(2)(ba) of the Securiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Criminal Complaint Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 195 CrPC. Private Complaint Not Maintainable for Offences Under Sections 191-192 IPC Committed in Judicial Proceedings.

The case arises from two criminal complaints filed by M/s Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and another against Prasad Vassudev Keni and others under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Consent Guidelines Requiring Pendency of Proceedings. Requirement of pendency of court proceedings or adjudication for consent applications under SEBI Guidelines is not arbitrary and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of cl...