High Court Upholds Rent Control Act, Denying Britannia’s Claim for Market Rent
8 Aug 2024The fixation of standard rent for an upscale apartment in Mumbai, which was rented to Maya Sunil Alagh, the wife of Britannia's former Managing Direct...
Search Results for "exorbitant rates"
198 result(s) found
Found 198 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Enhances Royalty for Court Receiver's Property in License Dispute. Court modifies Receiver's order fixing royalty at Rs.45,000 per month and enhances to Rs.1,50,000 per month based on valuation report and market rates.
6 Sep 2013The plaintiff filed a chamber summons seeking modification of the Court Receiver's order dated 24 August 2010 fixing royalty at Rs.45,000 per month fo...
- 68
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Patna Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Advertisement Royalty Dispute — Distinguishes Royalty from Tax and Upholds Corporation's Power to Charge Royalty Based on Agreement. The Court held that royalty is a contractual consideration, not a tax, and does not require legislative sanction under Article 265 of the Constitution.
17 Oct 2024The Supreme Court dealt with appeals by the Patna Municipal Corporation against a Division Bench judgment of the Patna High Court which had held that ...
- 606
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Challenging Irrigation Restoration Charges — Rate and Area of IRC Disputed; Petitioner Alleges Discrimination and Exorbitant Demand. Issue of whether IRC should be calculated at Rs. 50,000 per hectare as per report dated 11.01.2008 instead of Rs. 1 lakh per hectare under Government Resolution dated 06.03.2009.
5 May 2016The petitioner, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in power generation, challenged the demand for Irrigatio...
- 81
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Regularisation of Encroachment on Communidade Land at Reduced Rate — Petitioner's Long-Standing Encroachment Prior to Cut-Off Date Entitled to Regularisation at Rate of ₹1,500 per sq.m. Instead of ₹3,600 per sq.m. The Court held that the rate of ₹3,600 per sq.m. was arbitrary and not based on any valid criteria, and directed regularisation at the rate of ₹1,500 per sq.m. as per the Government Resolution dated 30.08.2004.
12 Mar 2020The Petitioner, Mrs. Martha Luis, filed a writ petition challenging the determination of a rate of ₹3,600 per square metre levied upon her for regul...
- 184
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Municipal Circular Revising Hoarding Advertising Licence Fees. Petition Questions Validity of 2009 Circular Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Sections 328A and 479.
27 Jan 2016The matter involved consolidated writ petitions filed by outdoor advertising firms and an association challenging licence fee revisions imposed by the...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Lease Rent Demand Against Indian Oil Corporation for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Collector's demand for arrears of lease rent for periods prior to 1995 set aside as time-barred and without authority under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
14 Jan 2005The petitioner, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, challenged a communication dated 14 March 2002 from the Collector, Mumbai Suburban District, demanding...
- 181
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to MMRDA in Metro Fare Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court restrains Mumbai Metro One from revising fares higher than government-notified rates pending arbitration.
24 Jun 2014The Bombay High Court was hearing an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Mumbai Metropoli...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Flat Purchase Dispute — Earnest Money Refund with Daily Fine and Compound Interest Upheld but Reduced. Clause 4 of Agreement for Construction and Sale Held to Be a Valid Forfeiture Clause, Not a Penalty, Under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
9 Mar 2005The plaintiff, Dr. Jagdish J.N. Counte, entered into a written agreement dated 13.4.96 with the defendant, M/s. Carl Estate Private Limited, for the p...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Excess and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrator Entertained Claims Beyond Scope of Reference and Relied on Unproved Certificates, Rendering Award Patently Illegal.
20 Oct 2016The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a construction dispute between Country Club (India) Ltd...
- 60
