Search Results for "electricity ombudsman"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "electricity ombudsman"

40 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Electricity Distribution Company Against Ombudsman Orders in Seasonal Consumer Billing Dispute. Demand Charges Must Be Based on Actual Utilisation, Not Contract Demand, Under Clause 14.11 of Tariff and Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission Regulations, 2005.

27 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Executive Engineer (O&M) of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited, a distribution licensee, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 ...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Quashes Electricity Ombudsman Orders in Seasonal Consumer Billing Dispute — Demand Charges Recovery Based on Contract Demand Upheld. The court held that the Ombudsman's direction to revise bills from March 2019 and refund amounts was contrary to Clause 14.11 of the Tariff and the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply Code and related matters) Regulations, 2005, and that the Ombudsman lacked jurisdiction to review its own order.

27 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Executive Engineer (O&M) of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited, a distribution licensee, challenged two orders passed by the Electric...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

16 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against MSEDCL for Refund of Infrastructure Costs Under DDF Category. Consumer Definition Under Electricity Act, 2003 Includes Persons Supplied Electricity for Layout Development.

10 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Smt. Savita Chandrashekhar Thodage, applied to the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) for a new electric...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Challenging Consumer Forum Order Setting Aside Supplementary Bills. Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Has Jurisdiction Under Section 42(5) of Electricity Act, 2003 to Adjudicate Disputes Regarding Defective Metering and Supplementary Bills.

18 Dec 2018

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25.03.2017 passed by the Cons...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions of IT/ITeS Companies Challenging Tariff Classification as Commercial Consumers Instead of Industrial Consumers Under Electricity Supply Regulations. The court held that software development and IT-enabled services are industrial activities, entitling the petitioners to HT 2(A) tariff category based on the nature of activity and promissory estoppel.

27 Nov 2017

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by IT/ITeS companies, including Talisma Corporation Private Limited, Cognizant Technology Sol...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows IT Companies to be Classified as Industrial Consumers for Electricity Tariff — BESCOM's Demand for Commercial Tariff Quashed. Software Development and Data Processing Constitute Manufacturing Process Entitling IT Companies to HT 2(A) Industrial Tariff Category Under BESCOM's Own Circular and Precedent.

27 Nov 2017

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by IT/ITeS companies, including Talisma Corporation Private Limited, Cognizant Technology Soluti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice in Electricity Billing Dispute — Petitioner Agro Industry Challenged Retrospective Reclassification and Demand for Arrears Under HT-2(A) Tariff. Court Held That Reclassification Without Prior Notice and Retrospective Application of Tariff Was Unlawful and Violative of Principles of Natural Justice.

7 Aug 2017

The petitioner, M/s Sri Balaji Agro Industries, is an agro-based industry located at Chicksugur Industrial Growth Center, Raichur. The respondent, GES...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Against MSEDCL Over Tariff Categorization of LPG Bottling Plant as Industrial Activity. LPG Bottling Plant Held to Be Manufacturing Activity Entitling Petitioner to HT I Industrial Tariff Under MERC Tariff Order.

19 Jan 2012

The Petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, challenged the categorization of its LPG Gas Bottling Plant at Sangli under the HT II Co...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Against Ombudsman's Order for Refund of Service Line Charges and Service Connection Charges. The court held that the Ombudsman had jurisdiction to entertain the consumer's complaint and that the charges were not recoverable upon restoration of contract demand.

7 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)