Search Results for "effective participation"

322 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 322 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Public Procurement Policy for MSEs Enforceable, Issues Directions on Minimum Turnover Clauses. The Court ruled that the Procurement Order 2012 has force of law and that minimum turnover clauses must be proportionate, directing effective implementation of the 25% procurement mandate.

The petitioner, a Micro Enterprise and its founder, challenged the legality of minimum turnover clauses in government tenders that prevented their par...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Issues Directions for Effective Implementation of POCSO Act in Public Interest Litigation. Court Directs Appointment of Nodal Officers, Awareness Programs, and Timely Victim Compensation Under Section 40 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The petitioners, three women residents of Bangalore, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Visually Impaired Peon Against Termination Due to 100% Disability. Holds That 40% Minimum Disability Requirement Under Advertisement Cannot Override Statutory Provisions of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995.

The petitioner, Patel Suleman Gaibi, who is 100% visually disabled, applied for the post of peon in the Irrigation Department of the State of Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...