Search Results for "distributorship"

85 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses LPG Distributor's Challenge Against Discontinuation of Home Delivery Charges Beyond Contract Territory. Principle of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Be Invoked Against Statutory Policy or When No Representation Was Made by the Authority.

The petitioner, M/s Jay Gas Agency, a proprietorship firm represented by Sneha Vilas Kulkarni, was appointed as an LPG distributor by Hindustan Petrol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petition on Retail Dealership Selection. Dispute Over Guidelines Applicability and Evaluation of Marks.

The petitioner, an applicant for a retail outlet (petrol pump) dealership advertised by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOC) on 14 September 2011, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Agreement Dispute. Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from termination of agreement over alleged plagiarism and failure to deliver a film.

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Reliance Media Works Limited (formerly Adlabs Films Ltd.) ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BPCL Circular Imposing Refill Ceiling Limits on LPG Distributors as Unilateral and Arbitrary. Distributorship Agreements Without Ceiling Limits Cannot Be Varied Unilaterally by Issuing Circulars.

The petitioners, seven LPG distributors of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), challenged a circular dated 4 January 2018 and a subsequent co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdictional Ruling in Distributor Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Not Extended by Conduct Despite Continued Commercial Dealings Post-Expiry of Two-Year Term.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Raymond Limited against an order of the lea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Tax Treatment of Compensation for Partial Termination of Selling Agency under Income Tax Act, 1922. The Court considered whether the sum received by the assessee for termination of agency rights outside Hyderabad State constituted a capital receipt or revenue receipt.

Background: The case involved the income tax assessment of the respondent, a registered firm carrying on business as selling agents and distributors o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal, Holding Compensation for Partial Termination of Agency is Capital Receipt. Termination of Agency for Territory Outside Hyderabad State Results in Sterilisation of Capital Asset, Not Taxable as Business Income Under Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

The dispute arose from the income tax assessment of Messrs. Vazir Sultan & Sons, a registered firm, for the assessment year 1951-52. The firm was appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Dealership Dispute Over Supply of Spurious Bearings and Non-Delivery. Court Upholds Termination for Breach of Implied Warranty of Genuineness but Remits Damages for Non-Delivery for Reconsideration.

The judgment concerns cross arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award arisin...