Search Results for "court fees valuation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "court fees valuation"

494 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 494 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Wife's Challenge to Valuation Order in Family Court. Court Holds That Valuation of Relief of Possession Must Be as on Date of Filing Petition Under Section 6(v) of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

25 Jun 2013

The petitioner wife challenged an order of the Family Court No.6, Bandra, Mumbai dated 25 July 2012, which directed the respondent husband to value th...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Maintainability of Suit on Valuation for Court Fee and Jurisdiction in Patent Ownership Dispute. Suit Valuation at Plaintiff's Discretion Under Sections 8 and 9 Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959, Cannot Be Overruled Absent Evidence of Incorrect Valuation.

20 Mar 2012

The suit was filed by Jer Rutton Kavasmaneck and another against Gharda Chemicals Ltd. and others seeking declarations, injunctions, and accounts rega...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Trial Court's Order on Court-Fees Valuation in Suit for Registration under Section 77 of Registration Act. Suit for Enforcement of Statutory Obligation Not Susceptible of Monetary Valuation, Governed by Section 6(iv)(j) of Bombay Court-fees Act, 1958, Not Section 6(xi).

5 Jul 2019

The petitioners, as plaintiffs, filed a suit in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pune under Section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908, seekin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Order Directing Payment of Court Fee on Higher Valuation in Appeal. Court holds that valuation for court fee and jurisdiction are distinct, and appeal valuation is determined by the relief granted in the decree, not the market value of the property.

9 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Pramod Prakashchandra Banait, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28/07/2014 passed by the Appellate Court (District ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Rejecting Plaint for Non-Payment of Court Fees in Suit for Specific Performance. Court Held That Under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959, Court Fees Must Be Paid on the Market Value of the Property as on the Date of Suit, Not on the Consideration Amount.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the applicants (original plaintiffs) against an order of the trial court rejecting their plain...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Valuation Order in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Possession. Suit for declaration of exclusive ownership and possession of flat must be valued on market value under Section 6(iv)(d) of Bombay Court Fees Act, not under Section 6(4)(j) for specific performance.

9 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Kiran Suresh Bhagiya, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Probate Case, Holding Court Fee Payable on Probate Value Not Property Value. Interpretation of Section 29 read with Schedule I, Clause 10 of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 determines court fee on probate application based on value of estate as per will, not market value of property.

7 Apr 2011

The appellants filed Misc. Application No. 15/2002 for issuance of a Probate Certificate in respect of a Will dated 14.12.1992 executed by deceased Ga...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Trial Court Order on Court Fee Valuation in Suit for Declaration and Mandatory Injunction. Court holds that when a plaintiff seeks declaration that a document is forged and not binding, the relief is not capable of valuation and court fee is payable under Section 24(d) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958, not under Section 11(2).

29 Apr 2015

The petitioners, who were plaintiffs in O.S.No.166/2006 before the II Civil Judge at Mysore, filed a suit for declaration that a palupatti dated 8.7.1...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Valuation Order in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Plaint Returned for Want of Jurisdiction Must Be Re-valued as on Date of Re-presentation Before Proper Court Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.

25 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Stono Craft Abrasives, filed an injunctive suit in O.S.No.2278/1990 before the City Civil Court, Bengaluru. Subsequently, the plaint w...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition by Defendants in Suit for Declaration and Injunction, Quashing Trial Court Order to Decide Valuation and Court Fee as Preliminary Issue. Held that issues relating to valuation and court fee are mixed questions of law and fact and must be decided at final stage under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC.

17 Jun 2026

The petitioners, who were defendants No.5 and 6 in a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the respondents (plaintiffs), challenged an order da...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)